Antagonism and Technicity: Bernard Stiegler on Eris, Stasis and Polemos

By Marchart, Oliver | New Formations, October 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

Antagonism and Technicity: Bernard Stiegler on Eris, Stasis and Polemos


Marchart, Oliver, New Formations


Abstract The essay seeh to sketch out, by outlining Stiegler's interpretation of ens, stasis and polemos as notions of social conflict, the relation between hü thought of technics and current thinking of the political. Stiegkr's notion of a 'de-fault of origin' is taken as an indication that he uto be located within the family of post- foundational political thinkers. At the same time, though, he tends to reduce politics to a rhetorical or strategic skill. It L· claimed that with thh 'ontic' account of politics or la politique 05 strategic action, important as it may be, an 'ontological' concept of the political as antagonism may get lost.

Keywords the political, political ontology, antagonism, technicity, postfoundationalism

AN ANARCHIC ONTOLOGY OF TECHNICITY

Bernard Stiegler's work stands as a truly original and important contribution to what may be considered an an-archic current within contemporary postfoundational thought - 'anarchic' not necessarily understood in the political sense of the term, but in a more ontological or quasi-transcendental sense. When Reiner Schürmann in his landmark study on being and acting in Heidegger advocated a paradoxical 'anarchy principle' (the book was originally entitled Le Principe d'anarchie), he did not refer to a particular 'ontic' program of action, he referred to the quasi-transcendental structure of being as it provides the 'ground' for all acting. Anarchy, in this sense, designates the withering away of 'the rule always to seek a first from which the world becomes intelligible and masterable, the rule of scire per causas, of establishing "principles" for thinking and doing'.1 Such withering away of first principles, however, must not be mistaken for the disappearance of all principles, what it designates is the destructive weakening of their status. And what is more, such an anarchic process of undermining their status as 'first' principles will in turn assume the paradoxical function of a principle, the principle of the withering away of principles: 'Still a principle, but a principle of anarchy'. This paradox of an anarchy principle, as Schürmann continues, is dazzling, 'because in two words it points within and beyond the closure of metaphysics, thus exhibiting the boundary line ofthat closure itself (p6).

Stiegler's work, as much as the work of other ontological an-archists such as Jacques Rancière (to whom Stiegler often refers in his more political writings) or Miguel Abensour, is located on this boundary line. Yet with Stiegler, new light is shed on debates in an-archic or post-foundational thought. Like few other contemporary philosophers, Stiegler has devoted his work to the philosophical re-foundation of the question of technics or technicity. The absence of an ultimate ground for action, or in Heidegger's terms, the intertwining between ground and abyss, is re-conceptualised in terms of an originary technicity premised upon what Stiegler defines as an originary default of all origin. It goes without saying that such a paradoxical approach is only comprehensible as long as we accept to apply a philosophical perspective to the question of technics. And indeed, to the extent that the 'anarchic principle' of being is philosophically framed in terms of an originary technicity, our framing will inherit the problematic of ontology as a prima philosophia - a theory of the structures of all being, i.e. of being-qua-being - even though, given that no 'first' principle is ultimately available, such ontology will amount to nothing more than what Derrida ingeniously called 'hauntology': a prime philosophy haunted by the absence of any ultimate principle.2

For Stiegler, the name of Ulis absence is technics or technicity; and to describe his thought as an ontology of technicity - a theory of all being-qua-technics - is certainly justified by the fact diat he deliberately seeks to circumvent any clear demarcation line between philosophical disciplines. Drawing such a line would constitute the philosophy of technology as simply one among many disciplines or 'regional ontologies', such as aesthetics, moral philosophy or political philosophy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Antagonism and Technicity: Bernard Stiegler on Eris, Stasis and Polemos
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.