The Political Consequences of Monetary Union

By Tietmeyer, Hans | Management Services, May 1998 | Go to article overview

The Political Consequences of Monetary Union


Tietmeyer, Hans, Management Services


Our second paper this month on EMU is based on a speech by the President of the Deutches Bundesbank, Dr Hans Tietmeyer given in Brussels at the end of February.

He emphasised that the Euro is not a formula for deliverance from all economic and political ills in Europe and that a stable single currency needs not only a sound economic but also a sound political foundation

Some current contributions to the subject of the Euro from time to time remind me of St Matthew's words Beware of false prophets". Some tend to paint a picture of catastrophe, while others herald the way to paradise. I consider both to be wrong.

Certainly the Euro as the future Community currency is not without its risks. But to equate risks with inevitable catastrophe from the outset has little to do with realistic analysis.

However this lack of realism also applies to those who announce that the Euro is a kind of formula for deliverance from all the economic and political ills in Europe. The Euro neither can nor will offer such deliverance. No currency could do so. On the contrary a common currency in fact brings with it new challenges.

Without doubt the Euro will offer fresh economic and political opportunities. And the responsible authorities have by intelligent and proper decisions seen to it that these potential opportunities actually become concrete advantages.

But monetary union will not solve the European problems by itself. Neither will its introduction alone eliminate the high level of unemployment, the structural problems in government finances and welfare system, or the poverty of those on the fringes of society. Nor will monetary union replace the continuing lack of political common ground in Europe as to how integration should move forward. And of course monetary union contains risks. Namely if its foundations should not prove lastingly stable; and if some participating countries should persist in not accepting the political and economic consequences and the rules of the common currency.

For this reason it is vital that all countries recognise the far-reaching consequences before entry into monetary union and that they also accept them permanently. For membership for the monetary union means an extensive economic and political commitment that will last forever.

Membership of the monetary union is indeed rather different from an exchange rate relationship such as many countries have already. It involves much more obligation and is more far-reaching.

A fixed but adjustable exchange rate in the current EMS remains a commitment subject to time, subject to cancellation, to say nothing of the present wide fluctuation margins about the central rate. On the other hand membership of the monetary union fixes the exchange rate forever, indeed it eliminates it.

Monetary union is a one-way-street. No subsequent revision or withdrawal of any kind is either legally or politically provided for. It would also cause considerable economic costs and above all great political damage.

It is not just the exchange rate that will be fixed. The entire monetary policy will be standardised and decided centrally for all participating countries. There will be a common central bank system unconnected with the various traditions and structures that have developed in the individual countries.

The monetary union is therefore a monetary community of destiny for better or worse.

The journey to monetary union in today's conditions is undoubtedly an event of unique significance, indeed in a double sense:

>unique because hardly comparable with current or previous monetary arrangements,

>but also unique in the sense that Europe will have just one attempt in the foreseeable future.

Therefore it must succeed. And above all it must become a lasting economic and political success for the integration of Europe.

The economic foundation

For one thing a stable and as far as possible conflictfree currency zone needs a sound economic foundation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Political Consequences of Monetary Union
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.