Myths of Invention: Law and the Ignorance about Genetics

By Limon, Cressida | The Australian Feminist Law Journal, December 2012 | Go to article overview

Myths of Invention: Law and the Ignorance about Genetics


Limon, Cressida, The Australian Feminist Law Journal


Abstract.

This article argues that the modern legal concept of invention is based on an 'ignorance about genetics.' The ignorance about genetics refers in general to the forms of imagination about biological reproduction in western philosophy. Adriana Cavarero's rewriting of the patriarchal form of the ignorance about genetics is extended to biological inventions. This article explores a general notion of biological invention in law and genetics and how intellectual property law continues to be based on myths of parthenogenesis. Such a myth is an image of genealogy based on the name of the father (law). But that is not the only possible genealogy. Clarice Inspector's novel A Breath of Life is a good starting point.

1.0 Introduction

All narratives of the origin take on a mythical turn, in that they speak what is: to speak what is qua what absolutely is, is always to endure Meno's aporia, to which a positive answer cannot be given.1

Does invention always involve a narrative of the origin and therefore a corresponding myth? Myth is clearly no stranger to invention. In Bernard Stiegler's analysis of an originary divide between art and craft technê) and knowledge episteme) in western philosophy, Meno's aporia, refers to the problem of the origin of knowledge:

A man cannot try to discover either what he knows or what he does not know. He would not seek what he knows, for since he knows it there is no need of the inquiry, nor what he does not know, for in that case he does not even know what he is to look for.2

In Meno, Socrates' response to this aporia (which Stiegler suggests is at the basis of modern philosophy) is to posit the immortality of the soul and its omnipotence prior to the soul's fall 'into the body.'3 At birth, the soul forgets this knowledge which nonetheless can be 'rediscovered.' Stiegler argues that in Meno the myth of anamnesis (the immortality of the soul) remains mysterious but that it will become 'dogmatic' in the Phaedrus4 whereby

the opposition of the soul and the body becomes the law of all philosophical discourse - and with it, the opposition between what will later be nature and culture, the human and the technical, as well as the question of technics qua writing.5

This opposition, at the origin of philosophical discourse, against myth, against rhetoric, against poetry, is repeated in the law of invention. But invention always escapes this law. Jacques Derrida began his essay on invention by recalling the word's Latin roots and by insisting that we need to keep this inheritance in mind.6 Inverino, in Latin, refers to that part of rhetoric (the art of oratory, or speaking well) that finds the ideas or things that the speaker deals with. Inventio is contrasted with disposino which arranges or places these ideas or things.7 The rhetorical tradition appears to have been displaced in the contemporary understanding of invention as a mechanical apparatus. But the advent of biotechnological, reproductive and genetic inventions has challenged the 19th century metaphors of invention.8 More precisely, it is the insistence of the modern law of invention (intellectual property rights are exemplary) that ideas are universal and therefore they belong to everyone. Invention, on the other hand, 'can display its originality only in the values of form and composition.'9 Significandy, Derrida writes,

There is no natural invention - and yet invention also presupposes originality, originality, generation, engendering, genealogy, that is to say, a set of values often associated with genius or geniality, thus with naturality. Hence the question of the son, of the signature and of the name.

We can already see the singular structure of such an event taking shape. Who sees it taking shape? The father, the son? Who finds himself excluded from this scene of invention? Which other of invention? Father, son, daughter, wife, brother, or sister? If invention is never private, what then is its relation with all the family dramas? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Myths of Invention: Law and the Ignorance about Genetics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.