Complying with Expanding State Transfer Pricing Rules

By Poniachek, Harvey | The CPA Journal, April 2013 | Go to article overview

Complying with Expanding State Transfer Pricing Rules

Poniachek, Harvey, The CPA Journal

Strategies for Multistate Corporations

Aggressive state audits and adjustments relating to intercompany transactions - specifically those involving intercompany royalty payments and service charges - could affect multistate corporations that engage in transfer pricing. Many states generally follow the transfer-pricing methodology under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 482 by enacting laws that adopt IRC section 482 or by granting analogous authority to their revenue commissioners (Cara Griffith, "States' No-HoldsBarred Approach to Auditing Transfer Pricing Arrangements," BNA Tax Analysts Practice Notes, Feb. 13, 2012). In order to challenge advanced-pricing agreements and other IRS taxpayer agreements for state tax purposes (specifically those related to the ownership and location of intangible property), some states have extended their authority (Technical Advisory Memorandum [TAM] 2012-1, New Jersey Division of Taxation, Feb. 16, 2012, http://www.state.nj. us/treasury/taxation/pdf/pubs/tams/tam20 1 2l.pdf; Brian Trauman and Nicole Crighton, "United States: State Tax Implications of Transfer Pricing Issues," KPMG Tax News Flash 201 1^19, Aug. 15, 2011).

Some states have extended the regulatory scope of their transfer-pricing administration by applying ad hoc approaches that, in addition to the arm's-length principle, utilize economic substance tests or impose unitary business filing requirements (Kathryn E. Rice, "The Challenges of State Transfer Pricing," Tax Advisor, AICPA, Sept. 1, 2010). The enforcement of transfer pricing rules can represent a significant source of revenue for states (Trauman and Crighton 2011). But although state revenue authorities can reject or challenge cases decided by the IRS, they risk exposing taxpayers to double taxation.

Unitary Filing and Transfer Pricing Adjustments

In a unitary filing, states require that corporate income tax be prepared on the basis of total organizational income; income is split among the states on a gross-to-gross basis of sales, assets, or another allocator. (See the Multistate Tax Commission's "Proposed Model Statute for Combined Reporting," amended on Jul. 29, 201 1 .)

In early 2010, 24 of the 47 states that apply income tax on corporations employed the "unitary combined reporting" method of taxation ("Spotlight on SALT: The Global Reach of the State Unitary Tax Regimes," Baker, Donaldson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, Feb. 23, 2010). The unitary approach has expanded in recent years to Vermont in 2006; New York in 2007; Michigan and Texas in 2008; and Massachusetts, West Virginia, and Wisconsin in 2009. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld "worldwide unitary combined reporting" as constitutional (Toni Rembe, "U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Worldwide Combined Methodology," Pillsbury Tax Page, barclays9408.shtml); however, the "water' sedge combined reporting" is now the norm, which includes only those members of the unitary group that are U.S. corporations.

For example, California applies the 80/20 rule, where 20% or more of the average of a foreign corporation's property, payroll, and sales are within the United States (not just in California), and then all of its income and apportionment factors are included in a California water' s-edge combined report. In another example, a foreign corporation, regardless of its U.S. apportionment factors, is included in a Massachusetts unitary combined report if more than 20% of its gross income comes from licensing intangible property or service-related activities to Massachusetts combined group members.

This author has observed that the unitary approach could be applied for the approximation of interstate transfer pricing, but the burden of proving consistency with the arm's-length principle is likely to rest with the taxpayer. The profit split between the licensor and licensee depends upon the functions performed and risk assumed by the two parties; therefore, it could constitute a wide range of feasible outcomes, including the 80/20 outcome (Stephanie Pantelidaki, Patrick Oparah, and Andrew Hickman, "CUPs and Profit Split- When and How to Use," Transfer Pricing International Journal, December 201 1). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Complying with Expanding State Transfer Pricing Rules


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.