A Legal Primer for Special Educators in Juvenile Corrections: From Idea to Current Class Action Lawsuits

By Leitch, David B. | Journal of Correctional Education, May 2013 | Go to article overview

A Legal Primer for Special Educators in Juvenile Corrections: From Idea to Current Class Action Lawsuits


Leitch, David B., Journal of Correctional Education


ABSTRACT

Without question, servicing the needs of incarcerated youth can be challenging. Not only is the average juvenile a complex individual with multiple needs but the facility itself is a composite of trained professionals that must work together to produce a juvenile able to successfully reenter society. Policies enacted to achieve this goal cannot be created within a vacuum. A thorough understanding of the relationship between program policy and legal concerns cannot be overlooked. In this article, a review of pertinent statutes and case law impacting the delivery of special education services within the juvenile correctional system is provided. The analysis then segues into the educational results that emerge when those requirements are not met.

Historical Context of Juvenile Law

Juvenile justice policy has long attempted to establish equilibrium between rehabilitation and punishment. The balance has been difficult to attain and maintain. More often than not, the emphasis between the two philosophies has been more of a pendulum swing than a steady course (Fagan, 2000). Jenson and Howard (1998) describe the cycle of policy changes as beginning in 1825 with an emphasis on separation between youth and adult in the justice system. That separation blurred through the 1800s until the establishment of the first juvenile court in 1899 which paved the way for an independent jurisprudence for juveniles (Krueger, 2008). In the latter half of the 20th century the pattern repeated itself as the public perception of increased juvenile crime, fueled by the Columbine shootings and other high profile youth atrocities, swayed politicians to adopt harsher sentencing guidelines for youthful offenders (Zaviek, 2005).

Concurrent with policy change came statutory regulations aimed at guaranteeing legal rights to juveniles immersed in the criminal system. At the federal level, the Congressional Digest (1954) identified the Surrender Statute of 1932 as the first federal statute controlling the disposition of juvenile delinquents. The Juvenile Delinquent Act of 1938 subsequently reduced the jurisdictional age of a juvenile from 21 to 18 years of age (Kreager, 2008).

A string of additional statutes were subsequently passed by Congress to cope with the burgeoning juvenile crime rate. The Federal Youth Corrections Act of 1950 began the development of procedures tailored to the needs of young offenders. Among its provisions was the establishment of classification centers that would assess the mental and physical condition of the juveniles, as well as, "...his personal traits, his capabilities, pertinent circumstances of his school, family life, and ... any mental or physical defect... contributing to his delinquency" (p. 299). This clause helped lay the foundation for future legislation targeting areas of developmental concerns unique to incarcerated juveniles. One such piece of legislation was the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of 1968 (revised in 1974 as the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act), a congressional effort toward improving services to juvenile delinquents, including a directive to remove juveniles from adult prisons.

State efforts at establishing and regulating juvenile delinquency procedures have varied widely since 1899, including recent statutory efforts to clarify the uniqueness of juvenile proceedings (Zaviek, 2005). For example, the Code of Virginia, §16.1 et seq. was amended in 2010 requiring the retention of most accused youth in a juvenile facility even if their case has been bound over to the adult system. In Colorado, a bill is currently pending that that would offer judges a diversion option called restorative justice. If implemented, the dispositional alternative would allow the state to dismiss charges if the offending youth successful completed the diversion program (National Juvenile Defender Center, 2011).

Education Law

In 2001, the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) brought significant changes to education law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Legal Primer for Special Educators in Juvenile Corrections: From Idea to Current Class Action Lawsuits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.