Chalk Talks - Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Kentucky Education Reform Act A Generation Later

By Wright, Sharon | Journal of Law and Education, Summer 2013 | Go to article overview

Chalk Talks - Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Kentucky Education Reform Act A Generation Later


Wright, Sharon, Journal of Law and Education


I. INTRODUCTION

In 1990, shortly after the Kentucky Supreme Court declared the state's educational system profoundly flawed in virtually every respect,' legislators approved sweeping reforms aimed at reducing the funding disparity between the state's richest and poorest school districts. The goal was to create an improved system promoting the core philosophy that all children are capable of learning, and most at high levels.2 The Kentucky Education Reform Act [KERA],3 increased the state sales tax to six percent and approved an additional $1 billion to fund new programs, including parent-teacher decision-making councils, preschool programs for disadvantaged children, family resource and youth services centers in districts with high poverty rates, and, perhaps most significantly, a plan to hold schools directly accountable for student performance.4 The law further restructured the Kentucky Department of Education, introduced statewide anti-nepotism rules and required that property be taxed at full market value.5

KERA supporters cautioned that the success or failure of the experiment would not be known until a generation of Kentucky schoolchildren had been educated under the new system.6 Only then, they asserted, could KERA framers measure the readiness of students in affluent districts clustered in the central and western parts of the state against that of students in property-poor districts.7

More than two decades later, the promise of KERA has been fulfilled in some respects and left wanting in others. On one hand, Kentucky has improved its historically low ranking in nationwide educational assessments. On the other, promised funding levels have failed to keep pace with student needs and, in some cases, have been misdirected into programs unrelated to academics.

Undoubtedly, the ambitious reform package shows signs of erosion due to years of political opposition and funding cutbacks. Nevertheless, the intervening decades demonstrate that, despite a continued need to adjust the sails and change course, education reform has produced a generation of Kentucky students that are better prepared than their predecessors to succeed in a global economy/

II. THE ROOTS OF REFORM

Kentucky's landmark education case, Rose v. Council for Better Education,9 wound its way to the state Supreme Court in 1989 in a political climate receptive to change. The council, a coalition of 66 school districts and the parents of 22 schoolchildren, had brought suit challenging Kentucky's school-funding system on the ground that it violated the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause,10 as well as a state constitutional provision that charged Kentucky lawmakers with providing for an efficient system of common schools" throughout the state.12

At the time, ninety percent of potential employers looking to relocate rejected Kentucky on the basis of its poorly educated workforce.13 The state was near the top of the nation in terms of unemployment and number of children living in poverty, but near the bottom in terms of per-capita income.14 Only two-thirds of Kentucky students who entered the ninthgrade graduated in four years, and only fifty -eight percent of ninth-grade students in the Jefferson County, the largest school system in the state, graduated high school.15 Businesses looked at Kentucky's weak educational system and saw a pool of high-school dropouts and graduates ill prepared for the workforce. Large employers found it difficult to attract and keep workers who wanted their children to attend good schools.16

The Franklin Circuit Court agreed with the Rose plaintiffs that the funding system then in place was unconstitutional. On appeal, the Kentucky Supreme Court went even further:

Lest there be any doubt, the result of our decision is that Kentucky's entire system of common schools is unconstitutional. . . . This decision applies to the entire sweep of the system - all its parts and parcels. This decision applies to the statutes creating, implementing and financing the system and to all regulations, etc. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chalk Talks - Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Kentucky Education Reform Act A Generation Later
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.