No Gold Diggers: China's Protection of Individual Property Rights in the New Marital Property Regime

By Chang, Valerie L. | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

No Gold Diggers: China's Protection of Individual Property Rights in the New Marital Property Regime


Chang, Valerie L., The George Washington International Law Review


I. Introduction

"I'd rather cry in a BMW car than laugh on the backseat of a bicycle." After infamously rejecting a potential suitor on a popular Chinese dating show in May 2010,1 Ms. Ma, a then 22-year-old model from Beijing, instantly became one of the most widely talked about women in China.2 Many Chinese expressed outrage towards Ms. Ma's cavalier comment and condemned her "money worshipping" attitude.3 Yet, many would also agree that Ms. Ma's statement was an accurate depiction of the materialism prevalent in modern Chinese society.4

Today, men5 (and their parents) fear "gold diggers" like Ms. Ma and the accompanying "flash divorces," in which a woman would "[w]oo the man, move into the house, divorce the man, take the house."6 This fear is not exactly unfounded: the notion of home and car ownership as marital prerequisites is deeply engrained in Chinese mentality.7 Meanwhile, divorces-most of which involve property disputes8-have been increasing at an annual rate of 7.6% over the past eight years.9 As real estate prices in China also continue to soar,10 parties entering into marriages with property now risk losing much more coming out if their spouses take half of the property upon divorce.11 More accurately, the parents of divorced males now risk losing much more, since parents in China traditionally purchase homes for their sons to improve his marital prospects.12

Chinese citizens are not the only ones concerned: gold diggers have also caught the attention of the Chinese government.13 The government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) often uses law as an instrument to target undesirable social conduct and shape citizen behavior.14 In the case of Ms. Ma's outburst, for example, the government quickly responded with a new set of harsh rules governing China's dating shows.15 The government restricted the broadcasting of "[i]ncorrect social and love values such as money worship" and cautioned the contestants against "mouthing venturous remarks."16

On August 12, 2011, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC)17 responded to mounting concerns regarding marriage, property, and gold diggers by issuing a new interpretation18 of the Marriage Law of the PRC (Third Interpretation). This new interpretation clarified the manner in which a marital home19 should be divided during a divorce.20 Before this interpretation, the marital home was presumed to be marital property (i.e., propertyjointly acquired during marriage and subject to division between divorcing par- ties),21 regardless of when it was purchased or which party held title.22 The Third Interpretation replaces this presumption with one in which a home acquired by and registered to one party before marriage is now considered the separate property of that party, not subject to division upon divorce.23

This new interpretation sparked heated debate among the Chi- nese citizenry,24 as well as in academic and professional circles.25 Because this change in the law would affect mostly women,26 some advocates of gender equality condemned the new interpretation as a reversion back to the feudal era of gender inequality.27 Others, however, saw it as a clarification of the law and a laudable step by the government for greater protection of individual rights.28

This Note will focus on the two most contentious provisions of the Third Interpretation, Article 7 and Article 10. Article 7 classi- fies any real property given to a party by his parents as that party's separate property.29 Article 10 concerns property that one party purchased with a loan before marriage, but for which both parties paid the mortgage using marital property.30 Article 10 stipulates that in the event of a divorce, this type of property shall belong to the party that purchased the home prior to the marriage, subject to that party's compensation of the other party for mortgage contri- butions and appreciation in value.31 This Note will argue that Arti- cle 7 is a consistent extension of China's legal movement toward greater protection of individual rights while effectively addressing the social problem of gold digging. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

No Gold Diggers: China's Protection of Individual Property Rights in the New Marital Property Regime
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.