Ethics, Justice, and Prosecution

By DeGabrielle, Don J.; Turner, Eliot F. | The Review of Litigation, Spring 2013 | Go to article overview

Ethics, Justice, and Prosecution

DeGabrielle, Don J., Turner, Eliot F., The Review of Litigation

I. That Justice Shall Be Done 281

II. Brady and the Problem of Self-Policing 282

A. Structural Problems 284

B. Identifying Brady Violations 286

C. Repercussions 288

III. Pursuing Justice 291

IV. Conclusion 296

In Berger v. United States, Justice George Sutherland wrote what has become an oft-cited maxim:

The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.1

As commendable as Justice Sutherland's command "that justice shall be done" is, it needs elaboration. Justice Sutherland himself identified two principles to inform the prosecutor's pursuit of this objective.

The first was substantive: "that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer."2 The second was procedural. Thus, while a prosecutor "may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one."3

As abstractions, neither principle is problematic. Prosecutors (we expect) aren't wont to seek indictments or try cases against people they believe are innocent in the first place. Still, "in some cases it is uncertain whether someone is guilty... or innocent of some crime."4 Although criminal procedure has developed since Sutherland wrote, and there are now better-defined rules, it is not always clear when those rules apply. For example, that evidence is exculpatory is in many instances self-evident, but in other cases, it may only be apparent when the evidence is viewed in context or as a case develops.

And so, despite (in most cases) best intentions, prosecutors sometimes do not abide by Justice Sutherland's command. Yet it is all the more important that they do so now. Prosecutorial power has increased as our criminal justice system has moved away from an adversarial system to one of negotiated pleas. Sentencing is more often than not dictated by mandatory minimums or guidelines calculations, which vests more power in the prosecutor through charging decisions. The traditional tools for checking prosecutorial abuse-judges and the juries-have a much smaller role in the process than they once did. Finally, remedial measures, like suits for damages, are all but nonexistent. As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention remarked: "[T]he life of a citizen ought not to depend on the fiat of a single person. Prejudice, resentment, and partiality are among the weaknesses of human nature, and are apt to pervert the judgment of the greatest and best of men."5

But because the life or liberty of the accused now depends increasingly on the decisions of one person, the prosecutor's commitment to seeking justice is all the more important. Here, we try to identify what one facet of seeking justice means and then examine the somewhat more beguiling question of how it could be better sought.

I. That Justice Shall Be Done

Sutherland was right that questions of guilt or innocence are paramount in determining whether justice has been done. Since Blackstone wrote his Commentaries, lawyers have been taught that it is "[b]etter that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."6 And as the legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin has also noted: "People have a profound right not to be convicted of crimes of which they are innocent."7 Of course, not everyone feels the same. As one jurist remarked: "Our procedure has been always haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted. It is an unreal dream."8 However unreal, and there is much to suggest it is not, Sutherland's second principle-procedural fairness-has been a key element of American criminal justice since (and even before) the Founding. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Ethics, Justice, and Prosecution


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.