Labour and the Defence Industry: Allies in 'Globalisation'

By Lovering, John | Capital & Class, Summer 1998 | Go to article overview

Labour and the Defence Industry: Allies in 'Globalisation'

Lovering, John, Capital & Class

One of the least noticed inheritances of the new Labour government is Britain's military bias. The British economy has long born the imprint of Imperial levels of military spending, and it still hosts an exceptionally large defence industry (Fine and Harris 1985, Edgerton 1989, Wulf 1993). It is not only large, it is also changing radically. Labour has come to power at a crucial stage in the restructuring of arms production. It has adopted a strategy for the defenceindustry which was developed largely by the industry itself. This article sets out the background and offers some suggestions as to the likely impact of the Blair government on the post Cold War reconstruction of the arms industry.

The dilution of the Peace Dividend and the absence of conversion

When the Cold War came to an end many observers optimistically looked forward to a peace dividend. The resources which could be released from military and military-industrial uses might be used to restore industrial capacity in countries and regions struck by de-industrialisation, or to rebuild the tattered welfare state. Some hoped they would be used to boost international assistance for development (Thee, 1991). In the event, one of the biggest peace dividends in history has been frittered away. In the US, 85% of the Peace Dividend has been soaked up in reducing the budget deficit (Bishak, 1997). In Germany the bulk of the saving arising from the redundancy of the Cold War defence apparatus has been used to reduce the impact of reunification on public spending. In Britain too the savings have been absorbed into the wider attempt to limit taxation.

Not that Cold War levels of defence spending have become a thing of the past. In the US and on the global scale defence spending is now around the level of the late 1970s, which the peace movement of the time regarded as a period almost-certainly suicidal 'Exterminism' (Thompson et al, 1983). Moreover, some believe that the decline in arms spending will soon bottom out and may even give way to an upturn. The decline in US spending is slowing, and in early 1997 President Clinton pledged to increase annual arms purchases from the present $42bn to $60bn by 2002 (Clark, 1997). In Russia defence spending is said by some to be so low that it threatens the collapse of the armed services and nuclear infrastructure and there is a vociferous demand for a spending increase to allow the creation of a modern professional army (Thornhill, 1997). In Britain, the incoming Labour government pledged to maintain Front Line capacity and immediately confirmed a number of major long-term projects. In France defence spending has only recently started to fall as a result of the Chirac government's EMU-oriented cuts in public spending, but it is intended to sustain a large part of defence research spending. Meanwhile, across Pacific Asia arms spending is rising, driven partly by growing GDP, and partly by simmering territorial disputes and militaristic governments. In the new century Japan could overtake the UK in terms of military spending. In the Middle East the post Gulf War slow-down in defence spending may be coming to an end.

Overall, although world military spending is perhaps a third below the level before the Berlin Wall came down, it is still enormous, and it may even grow again. The US, the one remaining military superpower, accounts for about half of it. The fact that US spending has remained so high, and that it is now in effect competing militarily with itself, testifies to the entrenched power of military and militaryindustrial interests that otherwise unusually democratic country. As a result, developments in the US have a profound influence on the reconstruction of the arms industry globally.

As in any industry, the combination of a downturn in demand and the expectation of big prizes in the future for companies that survive it has precipitated a burst of restructuring. Although the pace and details vary widely from country to country, this is everywhere characterised by a concentration of capital (through amalgamation and rationalisation), a narrowing of corporate specialisations, large-scale de-manning, and an overhaul of employment conditions and industrial relations as the balance of power shifts towards management. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Labour and the Defence Industry: Allies in 'Globalisation'


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.