Making the Most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: An Assessment of QCA Applications in Comparative Welfare-State Research

By Emmenegger, Patrick; Kvist, Jon et al. | Political Research Quarterly, March 2013 | Go to article overview

Making the Most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: An Assessment of QCA Applications in Comparative Welfare-State Research


Emmenegger, Patrick, Kvist, Jon, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

QCA's ability of addressing complex theoretical expectations and taking account of configurational relationships is rarely fully exploited. Assessing comparative welfare-state research, which has employed QCA, we find that only about half of the studies reviewed have expressed complex theoretical propositions in set-theoretical terms, revisited cases subsequent to the formal analysis, or subjected findings to robustness checks. We discuss the relevance of each of these three aspects and argue that carefully considering these will improve the quality of QCA applications.

Introduction

There has been a remarkable growth of textbooks, method chapters, and articles on qualitative configurational methods, especially QCA (see, for example, Ragin 2008; Rihoux and Ragin 2009; Schneider and Wagemann 2010). Although these publications give valuable advice on many aspects of applying QCA, it is not clear to what extent scholars actually stick to best-practice with regard to justifying the choice of QCA and with regard to interpreting the results of the formal QCA analysis. We argue that medium-N studies using QCA should express the (complex) theoretical expectations in set-theoretical terms, go back to the cases when interpreting the formal results, or carry out robustness tests. Our argument is that the capacity of QCA to align with complex theoretical expectations and deal with configurational relationships is not used to the full. We advance this argument by demonstrating and assessing how researchers have used QCA in the field of comparative welfare-state research.

There are good reasons for the choice of comparative welfare-state research: First, QCA renders itself to comparative welfare-state research because of the limited number of countries with welfare states that can meaningfully be compared, because of elaborate theoretical frameworks suggesting that the development of welfare states is characterized by multiple configurational causation, and the view of cases being configurations of different dimensions. Thus, it is not surprising that QCA is frequently used and accepted as a valuable tool in comparative welfare-state research in sociology and political science (cf. Amenta and Hicks 2010; Rihoux, Rezsöhazy, and Bol 2011). Second, and related, in the methodological literature on QCA, comparative welfare-state data have often served illustrative purposes (e.g., Amenta and Poulsen 1994; Hicks 1994; Ragin 2000). This means that it should be relatively straightforward for researchers in this field to relate the guidelines to their studies. Basically, we argue that if any one field is suitable for an assessment of QCA applications, it would be comparative welfare-state research.

The paper proceeds as follows. First, we describe the criteria for the selection of studies to examine, provide an overview of the nineteen studies included, and discuss the contributions these studies made to comparative welfare-state research. Second, we discuss how scholars have specified their theoretical expectations. Third, we assess how researchers have performed with regard to the interpretation of the formal QCA results. We conclude with a few remarks on the main findings and a call for more conscious use of some comparative advantages of configurational comparative analysis.

QCA and Comparative Welfare-State Research

We include 19 articles in our survey of QCA in comparative welfare-state research. First, we limited our focus to "causal research" with welfare states (or some core aspect thereof) as the outcome that has been published in English-language journals.1 Second, we searched for the combination of "QCA" and "welfare state" or "social policy" in five databases-Academic Search Elite, JSTOR, Periodicals Achieve Online, Project Muse, and ProQuest. Third, we supplemented with studies in the bibliographical database on the COMPASSS (2011) website and in the review article on QCA in public policy studies by Rihoux, Rezsöhazy, and Bol (2011). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Making the Most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: An Assessment of QCA Applications in Comparative Welfare-State Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.