An Opportunity to Be Heard: A Call for Impartiality in the Law School Admission Council's Disability Accommodation Review Process

By Dunn, Edward | Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, January 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

An Opportunity to Be Heard: A Call for Impartiality in the Law School Admission Council's Disability Accommodation Review Process


Dunn, Edward, Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice


Abstract: Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, endeavoring to eliminate discrimination against disabled Americans and assure equality of opportunity. The Law School Admission Council's (LSAC) accommodation review process contradicts this purpose when it denies disabled individuals seeking accommodation on the Law School Admission Test (LSAT). In its current state, this review process enables LSAC to issue denials without affording the disabled applicants an opportunity to be heard or to confront adverse witnesses. These omissions fail to meet procedural due process standards, but LSAC, as a non-profit, private corporation, is not compelled to meet these standards unless its monopolistic and coercive position over law school applicants qualifies its conduct as public in character. This Note argues that if the purpose of the ADA is to be fully realized, LSAC should implement an impartial appellate review process for disputes arising from accommodation requests by disabled individuals.

Introduction

Abby Rothberg noticed that she was different in the second grade when she could not read like the rest of her peers.1 Two years later, a psychologist diagnosed her with a learning disability based on her processing speed, confirming her suspicions.2 Rothberg's school dis- trict provided her with various accommodations, including extended time on tests, throughout the course of her elementary and secondary education, enabling her to succeed academically.3

Rothberg took both the SAT and the ACT before applying to col- lege.4 She took the SAT without an extended time accommodation and scored a 960, placing her in the 38th percentile of those who took the test.5 Rothberg received 50% additional time to complete the ACT and scored a 25, placing her in the 82nd percentile.6 She matriculated to Syracuse University and received accommodations throughout her col- lege education.7 By the start of her senior year, she had earned a grade point average of 3.3 out of 4.0.8

During her senior year, Rothberg decided to continue her educa- tion by attending law school.9 She registered for the Law School Admis- sion Test (LSAT) and applied to the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) for the accommodation of fifty percent additional time.10 LSAC denied her request, claiming that her documentation did not establish her disability.11 Rothberg took the LSAT in October 2003 without any accommodation.12 Hindered by her disability, she could not complete a significant portion of the test and resorted to randomly selecting answers for approximately one-third of the multiple-choice questions.13 As a result, she scored a 148, placing her in the 38th per- centile.14

Unsatisfied with her score, Rothberg decided to take the LSAT again and registered for the December 2003 test.15 She again at- tempted to secure an accommodation for the test and addressed LSAC's concerns regarding the documentation of her disability.16 She underwent a neuropsychological evaluation, conducted by a clinical psychologist experienced in learning disabilities, to obtain an assess- ment of her disability and a recommendation for taking standardized tests.17 This evaluation confirmed Rothberg's learning disability and concluded that because of her weak processing speed, it took her sig- nificantly longer "'than the majority of her peers to complete the same volume of material.'"18 The evaluation recommended that Rothberg receive extended time to complete all standardized tests to account for her disability.19

Rothberg submitted the report to LSAC as part of her application for an accommodation on the December 2003 LSAT.20 LSAC did not dispute the psychologist's qualifications to make such a recommenda- tion, but denied the request because the psychologist did not adminis- ter a particular reading test.21

After multiple fruitless appeals asking LSAC to reconsider, Rothberg opted not to take the LSAT that December.22 Instead, she vis- ited another psychologist who administered the required reading test; the second psychologist also concluded that Rothberg required addi- tional time on standardized tests. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Opportunity to Be Heard: A Call for Impartiality in the Law School Admission Council's Disability Accommodation Review Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.