Aristotelian Distinctions between Social and Natural Sciences

By Serban, Silviu | Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, July 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

Aristotelian Distinctions between Social and Natural Sciences


Serban, Silviu, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice


ABSTRACT.

The opposition between natural and social sciences started in ancient Greece as a relationship between theoretical and practical sciences. This opposition was set for the first time by Aristotle while asserting his theory of soul and his methodology of science. Thus, different functions of soul are responsible for these two kinds of sciences and, similarly, there are two logical instruments for each science to discover their scientific truths. If theoretical sciences use the apodictical syllogism that concludes from necessary premises, the practical sciences make use of the dialectical syllogism that starts from probable premises. The theoretical/ practical opposition is mirrored at the methodological level through the pair of terms apodictic/ dialectic.

Keywords: Aristotelian theory of science, theoretical sciences, practical sciences, Aristotelian theory of soul, Aristotelian logic, apodictic, dialectic

1. Introduction

Although disparate scientific knowledge existed before Greek civilization, science in its systematic form begins to spring with the sixth century on the territories of ancient Greece, the point that is also considered as the true beginnings of the philosophical research. Physical universe was the first object to which researchers have turned their attention to draw cosmological theories. The first who conceived such theories was the représentants of socalled School of Miletus in the early sixth century, whose main members were Thales, Anaximander and Anaximene. Although their theories about the genesis and evolution of the universe are considered the first authentic cosmologies, because of their explanations free of mythological elements, they initiated at the same time metaphysical explanation regarding the nature of the first principles. Thus physics and metaphysics entwine in their theories about universe without can draw a clear line of demarcation between scientific and philosophical explanations. In fact, this is a characteristic of all Greek philosophical-scientific thinking, science being subsumed to philosophy. For instance, the scientific concept of causality, through which the laws of science are formed, was conceived initially from a philosophical point of view which has created some failures to scientific explanations.

2. Aristotle's Theory of Science

Aristotle is the most important thinker of ancient Greek, the one who initiates the research in a series of new sciences, being the first who achieves a classification of sciences. He says that to know scientifically means to know the essence of the things, and to know the essence of things means to know their primary causes and principles. In the first paragraph of his Physics, Aristotle states this condition about natural sciences:1

In all disciplines in which there is systematic knowledge of things with principles, causes, or elements, it arises from a grasp of those: we think we have knowledge of a thing when we have found its primary causes and principles, and followed it back to its elements. Clearly, then, systematic knowledge of nature must start with an attempt to settle questions about principles.

Relating to the first princples, Aristotle states that there are four primary causes that help us to know the essence of a things. The four meanings of the cause are initially catalogued also in Physics:2

According to one way of speaking, that out of which as a constituent a thing comes to be is called a cause; for example, the bronze and the silver and their genera would be the causes respectively of a statue and a loving-cup. According to another, the form or model is a cause; this is the account of what the being would be, and its genera-thus the cause of an octave is the ratio of two to one, and more generally number-and the parts which come into the account. Again, there is the primary source of the change or the staying unchanged: for example, the man who has deliberated is a cause, the father is a cause of the child, and in general that which makes something of that which is made, and that which changes something of that which is changed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Aristotelian Distinctions between Social and Natural Sciences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.