Miller's Promise: Re-Evaluating Extreme Criminal Sentences for Children

By Straley, Nick | Washington Law Review, October 1, 2014 | Go to article overview

Miller's Promise: Re-Evaluating Extreme Criminal Sentences for Children


Straley, Nick, Washington Law Review


INTRODUCTION

Recent psychosocial studies and neurological research have proven that the structures and processes of the adolescent brain render young people more reckless and more susceptible to negative familial and societal pressures.1 In a series of recent cases, culminating in Miller v. Alabama,* 2 the United States Supreme Court relied on this science and recognized that, for young people, a confluence of immature judgment, vulnerability, social pressure, and decreased ability to appreciate long- term consequences can create a toxic environment with tragic results.3 The chances for unthinking violence are exponentially increased when homelessness, familial abuse or neglect, mental illness, and chemical dependency are added to the mix.4

However, because of their developing characters, children are also uniquely able to transform themselves; they can change from foolhardy, risk-seeking teenagers into mature, rehabilitated adults.5 It is these "characteristics of youth"6 and the developing science that explains them that animate the Supreme Court's recent juvenile sentencing decisions.7 As discussed in those cases, physiological differences between teenagers and adults carry constitutional significance and require that children be sentenced differently-a principle firmly rooted in recent science and longstanding legal distinctions between children and adults.8

In Part I, this Article analyzes Miller v. Alabama,9 Graham v. Florida,10 and Roper v. Simmons,n Part II explains the science underpinning those decisions. Part III shows how that science helps explain why the men currently serving life without parole in Washington for crimes committed as juveniles came to reside in prison. Part IV argues that the principles announced in Graham and Miller apply with equal force to long determinate sentences imposed upon children. Part V discusses how Miller and Graham track a growing societal disfavor for extreme punishments for youth. Part VI examines how the Washington legislature responded to this changing legal and social landscape during the 2014 legislative session when it fundamentally altered the sentencing structure applicable to children who commit serious crimes. Finally, Part VII discusses what else courts and the legislature should do to fully realize Mille fs promise.

I. THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS RECOGNIZED THAT CHILDREN MUST BE SENTENCED DIFFERENTLY THAN ADULTS

In a trilogy of recent cases, the Supreme Court has recognized that juveniles differ from adults in their psychosocial and neurological makeups and therefore must be sentenced differently-even when those children have committed heinous crimes.12 In 2005 in Roper v. Simmons,13 the Court extended the categorical rule it set out in Thompson v. Oklahoma14 barring the death penalty for children under the age of sixteen, to any person who was under the age of eighteen at the time of the crime.15 While Roper announced a number of important principles, the true impact of those newly articulated constitutional rules awaited further development in Graham and Miller.16

The Court heard arguments in Graham v. Florida, a case that presented the question whether children can be sentenced to life without parole for non-homicides, in the fall of 2009.17 In an opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, the Court ruled that imposition of such sentences in cases in which no one was killed violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.18

The Graham Court expanded upon the discussion begun in Roper that the unique attributes of children require that they be sentenced differently than adults. As in Roper, the Graham Court accepted recent scientific breakthroughs that explain why young people are inclined to engage in risky, anti-social behaviors; how peer pressure and poor familial circumstances more dramatically affect them; and how-given expected neurological development-many of them will outgrow the irresponsible, unthinking acts which lead them to prison. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Miller's Promise: Re-Evaluating Extreme Criminal Sentences for Children
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.