States Redefine Who Is Vulnerable, Jeopardize Protections for Elders

By Freeman, Iris C. | Aging Today, May/June 2003 | Go to article overview

States Redefine Who Is Vulnerable, Jeopardize Protections for Elders


Freeman, Iris C., Aging Today


Governors and state-agency directors are using both arithmetic and lexicography to battle steep projected budget deficits. The arithmetic is fairly straight-forward, with a hard reliance on minus signs. The lexicography is a little trickier. For Healthcare and social services, the fix involves writing new definitions of the terms vulnerable persons and core services. The apparent goal is to redefine who is vulnerable, redefine core services and apply the minus signs intil what remain are the indispensable protections for people at the of society. In several states, even adult protective service (APS) programs are falling outside the bounds of these politicized notions about which public services are essential for those most in need.

Across the United States, adult protective services have in common the elements of service they provide to people whom state statutes define as vulnerable. Those elements include receiving reports of abuse, neglect and exploitation; investigating the reports; determining risk; and assisting individuals at risk in reaching safety and remaining clear of harm. State programs otherwise vary in their structure and in the ways they interact with medical, mental health, legal, law enforcement, housing and other social services. In the corridors of some state capitols, these basic services are being targeted for repeal, reduction or structural invisibility.

THREE STATES

Until very recently, few in human services would have guessed that APS would be considered nonessential, even in a time of austerity. Here are three variations on a theme:

California governor Gray Davis, a Democrat, proposed realigning the state's health and social service system to place the locus of decision-making in the counties, rather than in state agencies. Under this approach, counties would have total flexibility in deciding the level of APS-including the option of eliminating the program. State funding decisions in recent years have already weakened APS program funding and county mandates. Abandoning investigations of abuse to the vagaries of community priorities would revert protections afforded vulnerable adults to the conditions that led to the current law. Since the statute was enacted in 1998, the number of reports and clients served has climbed steadily and markedly. According to recent data, California leads the nation in reporting cases of abuse and vies with Texas for the highest number of confirmed reports.

The proposed budget by Ohio governor Bob Taft, a Republican, went a step beyond devolution of responsibility to counties. His recommendations cut the state's APS funding and dropped mandatory reporting, investigations and services. Advocates believe repealing an APS law that has been on the books since 1981 not only would foster chaos in the handling of elder-abuse cases at the local level but also would have the potential of eroding the rights of vulnerable individuals in court.

As in most other states, Ohio's budget debate is still a work in progress; as of this writing, the original proposal is subject to reconsideration and amendment. Nevertheless, if the funding and requirements are not restored, local services will be substantially weakened. Some Ohio counties are now. Officials in Lake County, for example, have already tried to economize by transferring the APS staff to child protective services.

In Minnesota, the budget proposed by Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a Republican, also used the constructs of block grants and local options. The curious twist is that the of the APS program is not even whispered. APS funding from federal Title XX and Social Services Block Grants and the state Community Social Services Act would be pooled in a fund to address the "needs of children, adolescents and young adults in each county in accordance with a service agreement between the county and the Commissioner of Human Services." Policy analysts might ask whether this fund incorporates vulnerable adult protection funds in the children's block grant. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

States Redefine Who Is Vulnerable, Jeopardize Protections for Elders
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.