Negative Effects of Close Social Relations

By Antonucci, Toni C.; Akiyama, Hiroko et al. | Family Relations, October 1998 | Go to article overview

Negative Effects of Close Social Relations

Antonucci, Toni C., Akiyama, Hiroko, Lansford, Jennifer E., Family Relations

Negative Effects of Close Social Relations* Toni C. Antonucci,** Hiroko Akiyama, and Jennifer E. Lansford

This study examines close social relations among older married adults with children. Results indicated that women named more close relationships than did men and were less happy the more people they named, though this was not true of less close relationships. People who reported negative feelings about network members were less happy. Specifically, men who wanted more people they could depend on and who felt their network was too demanding were less happy, while women who felt that their network members got on their nerves were less happy These results suggest that not all aspects of close relationships are positive and that women may not necessarily be advantaged by having more people with whom they feel close.

Key Words: gender differences, negative support, social support

In recent years a great deal of research has focused on social support and support networks both in the population at large (Cohen & Syme, 1985; Cutrona, 1996; House, Landis, & Umberson, 1988; Pierce, Sarason, & Sarason, 1996; Sarason, Sarason, & Pierce, 1990) and with older people specifically (Antonucci, 1990; Chappell, 1992). Empirical evidence has begun to accumulate which documents some popular beliefs, while "debunking" others as myths. In this paper we sought to continue these explorations through an examination of two significant issues in the field: (a) gender differences in the presence and meaning of close social relationships; and (b) gender differences in negative aspects of social relationships and their effect on well-being. The literature details a relatively long tradition of recognized gender differences in social relations (Antonucci, 1994; Vaux, 1985). It has been suggested that women are simply more "social," that they enjoy interactive exchanges more than men do (Eagly, 1987; Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974). Social psychological research has provided interesting specifics about the nature of women's social relationships compared to those of men. For example, it is well documented that women are more self-disclosing and more intimate in their relationships (Cutrona, 1996; Duck, 1990). It has generally been assumed that these are assets and that women benefit from their social ties. However, some researchers (e.g., Troll, 1988; Turner, 1982) have suggested that women's close social ties might not always have a positive effect on their well-being. Belle (1983) found in her in-depth study of young adult women that their most significant sources of stress were close relationships, especially husbands or partners. Similarly, Troll (1988) noted that the role of kinkeeper (the person who maintains family ties, remembers birthdays and organizes holiday dinners) which is often ascribed to women, might easily be more of a burden than a pleasure.

In a series of studies Rook (1984, 1990; Rook & Peitromonico, 1987) has shown that social ties can have a binding, negative side for older women and that while more positive than negative interactions are likely to occur, the impact of negative interactions on well-being can be considerable. In an innovative longitudinal study using the daily diary technique, Rook (in press) has shown that negative social exchanges are related to more life stress and less supportive networks. Her findings led her to conclude that both personal characteristics such as daily mood and self-esteem as well as life context such as the experience of stressful life events, influence older people's vulnerability to negative social exchanges.

Several others have examined positive versus negative effects of close social relationships. Riley and Eckenrode (1986) explored differences in the costs and benefits of social ties among younger women (women in their thirties). They found that women with more personal and psychological resources benefitted more and experienced less stress from their social ties. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Negative Effects of Close Social Relations


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.