Shifts in the Meaning of Sovereignty and Applicability of the Concept for Analysis of Contemporary World Politics

By Baluev, Dmitry Gennadievich | Asian Social Science, February 2015 | Go to article overview

Shifts in the Meaning of Sovereignty and Applicability of the Concept for Analysis of Contemporary World Politics


Baluev, Dmitry Gennadievich, Asian Social Science


Abstract

This paper deals with changing meaning of sovereignty in context of globalization. It touches upon dialectic relations between sovereignty and globalization. Attitudes towards sovereignty of different non-state actors of contemporary world politics and different states are special interest for the author. The main aim of the article is in analyzing how the changes in technology associated with globalization and creation of civil rights protection rules result in emergence of new political structures and new rules that will replace the rules and structures associated with sovereignty, examines the growing role of new actors in world politics in a multipolar world and uncertainty.

Keywords: sovereignty, international relations theory, world politics, foreign policy

1. Introduction

According to numerous authors, the current epoch is associated with the terms "post-realism" and "post-positivism" (Smith, Booth, & Zalewski (Eds.), 1996). International relations were historically viewed through the prism of the state. Such approach was also dominating during the second half of the twentieth century. However, despite all efforts to become a "timeless truth" (Buzan, 1996), realism is associated with a specific historical context. According to G. Youngs, realistic tradition in international relations, its principles and orientation can be fully understood only when placed in the context of the time when they were formed. It was the time of wreckage of inter-war hopes for world peace through the League of Nations and the beginning of World War II (Youngs, 1999). Studies on sovereign state creation often interpret outside involvement in domestic politics as a force against which nationalist forces mobilize (Chong, 2011). The realism consolidation time was at the cold war epoch. Changing primary units of analysis is the feature of the new era. The evolution rides the line of the state monopoly crisis. Technological, economic, political and cultural changes in international relations are so important that some authors even offer to change the discipline name. For example J. Rosenau, proposed to replace the term "international relations" by "post-internationalpolicy" (Rosenau, 1989). G. Youngs speaks about international relations evolution to global relations (Youngs, 1999).

Nowadays the use of classical geopolitical approach to international relations analysis is becoming less popular. It is stated that in the era of globalization, national boundaries become irrelevant. Most of the post-industrial states have departed from territorial expansion as self-sufficient political objective. Instead, they focused on economic and technological development. Such events as NATO military action in Kosovo, Libyan campaign or talks about intervention in Syria also undermine the principles of territorial sovereignty and the inviolability of borders.

Another problem is that the very notion of sovereignty is western-centered. As Timo Kivimäki has pointed out, "The theory of international anarchy can possibly be supported by European, but not by East Asian, experiences. Supranational control over states seemed acceptable to Europeans; they liad suffered under conflicts caused by expansive nationalism, and thus integration was greeted as a commonly accepted remedy and the foundation of a peaceful, commonly accepted normative order in Western Europe. However, since the Asian experience was different, a sense of ownership could not be infused into their normative order by simply copying the European recipe based on European experience." (Kivimäki, 2012).

Nowadays it makes sense to consider sovereignty only in dialectic correlation with interdependence. Only the contradictions between them give the sovereignty an inherent meaning. Preservation of sovereignty means the ability to achieve objectives despite the interdependence pressures or even using them (Tsygankov, 2000).

2. Materials and Methods

There is a popular question: whether the system of sovereignty is just a relic of the past? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Shifts in the Meaning of Sovereignty and Applicability of the Concept for Analysis of Contemporary World Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.