Income Tax Allocation: The Continuing Controversy in Historical Perspective

By Schultz, Sally M.; Johnson, Roxanne T. | The Accounting Historians Journal, December 1998 | Go to article overview

Income Tax Allocation: The Continuing Controversy in Historical Perspective


Schultz, Sally M., Johnson, Roxanne T., The Accounting Historians Journal


Abstract: The appropriate means of accounting for income taxes on financial statements has been among the most hotly debated and frequently recycled issues of the past SO years. This retrospective account begins with the issuance of the first professional standards during the 1930s and 1940s, and illustrates how theoretical arguments, developed in professional and academic journals during the 1950s, were subsequently recycled and revised during later decades. The problems that led to reconsideration of the deferred tax issue by both the APB during the 1960s and the FASB during the 1980s and 1990s are discussed, as are the solutions offered by these standard setters.

INTRODUCTION

The appropriate means of accounting for income taxes on financial statements has been among the most hotly debated and frequently recycled issues of the past 50 years. The Committee on Accounting Procedure (CAP), the Accounting Principles Board (APB), and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have all addressed the issue. Nevertheless, critics of FASB's most recent approach [Rosenfield, 1990; Defliese, 1991] provided evidence that agreement about the best solution to this problem is still lacking. This retrospective account of the ongoing debate is based on an examination of professional standards, research reports, and articles in leading academic and professional journals. General developments in accounting theory and the standards-setting process serve as a backdrop for examining accounting for income taxes. The paper attempts to provide readers with an understanding of how the accounting issues and authoritative literature have evolved, thereby providing a basis for understanding current requirements.

A broader perspective is taken in this paper than in other recent histories of tax accounting, which have focused solely on the development of professional standards [Rayburn, 1986; Plunkett and Turner, 1988; Johnson, 1993]. It serves to update earlier works that considered the development of both theory and practice [Black, 1966; Nurnberg, 1971; Beresford et al., 1983]. The paper focuses on the debate about the extent to which income tax allocation is appropriate and which method should be applied. Aspects of the topic that are beyond its scope include discounting of deferred taxes and the information content of tax deferrals. Based upon a review of the literature, the authors focus on those writers who introduced or distilled the prevailing theory or presented cogent discussions of the issues. The chronological organization of the paper is based on the periods during which CAP, the APB, and FASB respectively were in existence.

THE CAP ERA (1936-1959)

Income taxes became a permanent part of the federal tax system with the passage of the Corporation Tax Law in 1909 and the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1913. However, the main source of tax revenues prior to World War II was local property taxes. During the World War II period (1939-1945), income taxes gained in importance because of an increase in the marginal corporate income tax rate from 19% to 38% [Sommerfeld and Easton, 1987, pp. 168170]. Following World War II, there was an economic expansion and an increase in the number of shareholders. Measures such as earnings per share gained in importance, which led to pressures for more comparable income numbers [Carey, 1970, pp. 58-59]. The emphasis on the measurement of income tax expense reflected the general concern with income measurement during this era [Bailey, 1948, pp. 10-14; Shield, 1957, p. 53].

CAP had been formed in 1936 and was expanded and given the authority to issue pronouncements in 1938 [Davidson and Anderson, 1987, p. 116]. Its first pronouncements were issued in 1939, including one addressing an early tax allocation issue. This issue arose in the 1930s when a decline in long-term interest rates led many companies to refund bond issues. In computing taxable income, firms deducted the unamortized discount and redemption premium on the bonds refunded. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Income Tax Allocation: The Continuing Controversy in Historical Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.