Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round

By Maskus, Keith E. | Economic Review - Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, First Quarter 1993 | Go to article overview

Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round


Maskus, Keith E., Economic Review - Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City


Recent international trade negotiations have centered on completing a broad new agreement on trade rules in the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Conservative estimates show that if the pending agreement is implemented, it will stimulate world economic growth by adding over $200 billion annually to global output (Nguyen, Perroni, and Wigle).

A principal objective of the Uruguay Round is to update global rules covering traditional trade policies, such as tariffs, quotas, and export subsidies. More important, the pending agreement will also bring under multilateral GATT disciplines for the first time broad areas of commercial regulations that influence trade. Such areas as restrictions on services trade, foreign direct investment, and intellectual property rights are playing an increasingly important role in world trade. Moreover, unless suitable agreements on these emerging trade issues are reached in the GATT, they are likely to become the principal cause of future trade disputes.

Of these important new trade issues, intellectual property rights, or IPRs, play a critical role in economic growth and development. Intellectual property rights are patents, trademarks, and copy rights that grant exclusive rights to sell new products and thereby give incentives to undertake innovative research and creative activity. Currently, IPRs offer levels of protection that differ sharply across countries. In general, IPRs are strongest in developed countries and weakest in developing countries. As a group, developed countries are concerned that unequal protection of intellectual property results in a significant loss of revenue through unauthorized imitation and copying in various countries. In contrast, many developing countries feel that stronger IPRs would increase the costs of acquiring new technology and thus significantly raise the price of consumer products. This conflict underlies efforts to develop an international agreement on IPRs as part of the Uruguay Round.

This article examines the growing prominence of intellectual property rights in trade policy and discusses the likely outcome of an IPR agreement in the Uruguay Round. The first section of the article provides an overview of IPRs and presents evidence of their importance in international trade. The second section describes international differences in IPR policies and examines both the costs of these differences and the potential results of increased harmonization. The third section describes the likely form of an agreement on IPRs resulting from a successful completion of the Uruguay Round.

AN OVERVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Intellectual property rights are policies that assign and protect the rights to earn income from innovative and creative activity. IPRs provide legal authority to control the dissemination and commercialization of new information and ideas and to enforce sanctions against their unauthorized use. IPRs play a critical role in economic growth and development because they affect the profitability of industrial research and the rewards to creative activity. At the same time, IPRs are controversial because stronger protection of property rights may come at the expense of higher prices and reduced availability of products. With the growth of world trade and increased foreign direct investment in the 1980s, IPRs have become a central issue in trade policy.

TYPES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

There are two general types of intellectual property. Industrial property refers to inventions of value to industry and commerce. Artistic property relates to artistic and literary works, such as books, pieces of art, filmed works, and recorded music. While most goods and services are easily classified into one of these two categories, certain new technological innovations fall between these traditional categories and do not yet have a standardized classification.

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.