Unfair Housing Acts

By Bovard, James | The American Spectator, April 1999 | Go to article overview

Unfair Housing Acts


Bovard, James, The American Spectator


HUD is shaking down lenders for billions of dollars in settlements on specious grounds of racial discrimination, all to ustify government as the last line of defense against moral barbarism.

It was the kind of triumphal photo-op that the embattled president needed. On January 18, Martin Luther King Day, President Clinton was "pleased to announce" the largest-ever settlement for a home-lending discrimination suit. "The Columbia National Mortgage Company will offer-listen to this-$6.5 billion in home mortgages and extra effort to help 78,000 minority and low- and moderate-income families unlock the door to home ownership," the president boasted. The same day, at King's old church in Atlanta, Housing Secretary Andrew Cuomo also touted the settlement: "If companies know we're going to enforce the law, you'll see more compliance. And $6.5 billion says we're going to enforce the law."

There was just one problem. The entire settlement was a sham.

It wasn't the first time-and it likely won't be the last-but Columbia National's ordeal illustrates this administration's idea of fairness when it comes to faceless, private corporations: wild accusations and record settlements, all to convince voters that the federal government is the sole force preventing America from slipping into moral barbarism. And all in the name of correcting "racist" practices that never existed in the first place.

$130 MILLION A MINUTE

The Columbia National case began in 1996, when the Fort Worth Human Relations Commission received a $100,000 grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to send pairs of testers-each pair comprising a white and minority loan "applicant"-to investigate possible fair-housing violations by mortgage companies. Three pairs went to a Columbia National office.

The first two pairs found no problems, but the third uncovered sufficient discrimination to alert HUD: The white male tester spent an hour with a female loan officer, while the Hispanic male tester spent only 20 minutes with a male loan officer. According to the commission's report, the loan officer who saw the Hispanic male, after shaking his hand, "excused himself to use the restroom. About two minutes later, he retumed from the restroom and the interview began." The report concluded that there were no "extenuating circumstances" to justify the interruption, and the subsequent $6.5 billion "settlement" could make this the most expensive bathroom break in history. (Never mind that the white male tester waited five minutes to see his loan officer.)

The official settlement from HUD stated the department's grave concern about an alleged difference "in the level of encouragement given to apply for a loan" between the Hispanic and white applicant. The Columbia National officer did seek to prequalify the Hispanic for a mortgage, providing him with a loan application and his business card. But HUD judged that the difference in the time the loan officers spent with the two applicants was conclusive proof of wrongdoing.

The department later admitted that the two testers gave different information. The Hispanic, for instance, claimed to have less personal savings than did the white tester. Neither would provide his Social Security number or an address, nor did either allow the loan officer to pull his credit reports. Columbia National CEO Dave Gallitano noted that such conduct "is very unusual. It would result in a good sales person spending time with them-being courteous-but they will not spend a huge amount of time because it is not an application yet."

Nevertheless, White House and HUD press releases on the case implied that the company was being fined $6.5 billionlargely for a 4o-minute differential in interviews for a single pair of people. That's over $150 million per minute.

A HUD official involved in the case, speaking on condition of anonymity, says that "no formal investigation was ever completed; therefore, there was no formal finding one way or the other. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Unfair Housing Acts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.