Grenig & Scanza on Arbitration * Understanding Evidence (Part Iii)

Dispute Resolution Journal, February 1, 2016 | Go to article overview

Grenig & Scanza on Arbitration * Understanding Evidence (Part Iii)


I. INTRODUCTION

In the final installment of their three-part series on evidence in arbitration, the authors focus on some of the more challenging issues confronting arbitrators when attempting to decide cases. Reliability of evidence including the testimony of lay and expert witnesses, business and medical records as well as the results of polygraph examinations are all discussed.

II. RELIABILITY

A. Hearsay

"Hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.1 A statement is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at the hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement and the statement is inconsistent with the declarant's testimony and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition, or consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, or one of identification of a person made after perceiving the person.2

In addition, a statement is not hearsay if the statement is offered against a party and any of the following is true:

* It is the party's own statement, in either an individual or a representative capacity.

* It is a statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth.

* It is a statement by a person authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the subject.

* It is a statement by the party's agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship.

* It is a statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.3

The contents of the statement must be considered but are not alone sufficient to establish the declarant's authority, the agency or employment relationship and scope thereof, or the existence of the conspiracy and the participation therein of the declarant and the party against whom the statement is offered.4

The Federal Rules of Evidence contain over thirty exceptions to the hearsay rule.5 Still, in keeping with the general policy favoring consensus, arbitrators seldom preclude hearsay evidence from being introduced.6 Although hearsay is usually admitted, many arbitrators are reluctant to simply accept it without comment.7 Many arbitrators note the objection to the hearsay and warn that, while the evidence is admissible, it is likely to be accorded little weight unless it is corroborated by other testimony or supported by stronger or direct evidence.8

Hearsay documents, including sworn declarations, where there is no witness who may be cross-examined, they may be ruled inadmissible absent special exceptions.9 Many arbitrators, however, will admit "subject to weight" such relatively routine items as doctors' statements concerning an employee's absence because of illness or police reports.10 Records kept in the ordinary course of business will normally be admitted.

When a hearsay statement is admitted in evidence, Fed. R. Evid. 806 provides as follows:

When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Rule 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported, by any evidence which would be admissible for those purposes if declarant had testified as a witness. Evidence of a statement or conduct by the declarant at any time, inconsistent with the declarant's hearsay statement, is not subject to any requirement that the declarant may have been afforded an opportunity to deny or explain. If the party against whom a hearsay statement has been admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party is entitled to examine the declarant on the statement as if under cross-examination.

B. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Grenig & Scanza on Arbitration * Understanding Evidence (Part Iii)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.