Description in Art Criticism and Art Education

By Geahigan, George | Studies in Art Education, Spring 1999 | Go to article overview

Description in Art Criticism and Art Education


Geahigan, George, Studies in Art Education


Description figures prominently in educational models of art criticism. As these models become increasingly used in classroom instruction, it is important that educators understand the kind of activity they are prescribing. In this article, I argue that the concept of description that educators present in their models differs from the concept of description in ordinary language. It is, instead, a technical concept borrowed from the literature of aesthetics. This article delineates the differences between each concept, describes how the confusion arose, and discusses the implications for art criticism instruction.

What do critics do when they describe a work of art? There is an urgent need to answer this question because description figures prominently in educational prescriptions for art criticism. As these become increasingly used as guides for instruction, it is important that educators understand the kind of activity they are prescribing. There is a view of description that has come to be widely accepted in the art education literature. This view can be summed up in four propositions:

1. Description is an intrinsic part of the process of art criticism.

2. Description is concerned with listing or inventorying the objective features (data) of a work of art.

3. Description does not use emotive or expressive but, rather, "neutral" language.

4. Descriptions are either true or false.

Contrary to this commonly accepted view of description, in this article I shall argue that,

1. Description is not an intrinsic part of the process of art criticism.

2. Description is not concerned with listing or inventorying the objective features (data) of a work of art.

3. Description can involve the use of emotive or expressive language.

4. Descriptions are never true or false.

If this common view of description is so wide of the mark, how did it come to be embodied in the art education literature? If it is wrong, what then is description? And what implications does all of this have for art criticism instruction? In this article I shall address each of these questions in turn.

Two Conceptions of Description

The commonly accepted view of description which I have outlined above does not reflect the ordinary meaning of "description" in terms of what people actually do when they describe a work of art. It reflects, instead, an uncritical adoption of a technical use of the term "description" in aesthetics and philosophy. To understand how this technical sense of "description" became embodied in the educational literature requires that one give an historical account of the genesis of the term "description" in philosophy and how educators relied upon philosophical accounts of art criticism when formulating models of art criticism for the classroom.

The Technical Use of the Term "Description"

The technical use of "description" emerged during the early decades of the century as part of a program of philosophical investigation into the nature of language. Toulmin and Baier (1952) describe the aim of this program as the elucidation of controversial types of utterances, such as those found in ethical and aesthetic discourse. This was done by drawing a single sharp distinction between different kinds of utterances. To mark the distinction, philosophers appropriated the word "description," a word with a standard use in ordinary language. But they used this word in a quite different way: to refer to a class of words or sentences that stood in contrast to other, less well understood utterances, such as prescriptive utterances, normative utterances, value sentences, emotive utterances, etc. Although they point out that the distinction between descriptive and other utterances was actually drawn along different lines by various philosophers, by mid-century the conviction that two separate classes of utterances could be distinguished from one another had become firmly embedded within the philosophical literature. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Description in Art Criticism and Art Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.