The Invention of Party Politics: Federalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Development in Jacksonian Illinois

By Shade, William | Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, Summer 2003 | Go to article overview

The Invention of Party Politics: Federalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Development in Jacksonian Illinois


Shade, William, Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society


The Invention of Party Politics: federalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Development in Jacksonian Illinois. By Gerald Leonard (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002. Pp. 328. Cloth, $48.00).

In the 1960s, when Arthur Schlesinger Jr. announced that Americans had invented the first modern political parties in the 1790s, it seemed as clear a fact as the claim that the American Constitution was the oldest in the world. At the height of the Cold War these seemed to be crucial markers of American democracy. Today we have one of our foremost political scientists asking, "How Democratic is the American Constitution?" and many historians such as Gerald Leonard questioning exactly when and how the system of two-party competition was "invented." Of course this is not a new question and Leonard is simply building on a literature that has evolved since the 1960s when Schlesinger was so sure in his statement. Lee Benson and Richard Hofstadter, and their students Ron Formisano and Mike Wallace, have been the leaders among scholars who have charted anti-partyism in early American political culture. (While it is still a matter of vigorous dispute, a consensus has emerged that Americans did not embrace modern mass political parties and a political culture of partisanship until the end of the 1830s. Leonard accepts this and documents the story for Illinois, but his main argument is somewhat different from what most historians have said.)

Leonard is a lawyer and is interested in American constitutional history. Thus he wishes to place the Invention of Party Politics in a broad interpretation of the evolution of constitutional government in the United States. He begins by noting that political parties are not mentioned in the Constitution-Hofstadter called it a constitution against parties-and turns to Willard Hurst's enlarged conception of the American constitution, something like the British might see the matter. Leonard argues correctly that parties have become part of the larger American constitution and he is asking when and why this happened.

Leonard's answer to the question of when America invented party politics is not far from that of Roy Nichols in the old book with a similar name and the position that is something of a consensus among current scholars-about the presidential election of 1840. He uses the nomination process and the connection between state and federal politics as his key indicators of the existence of modern mass parties. But his argument is somewhat different than others who have placed the appearance of modern parties at this time. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Invention of Party Politics: Federalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Development in Jacksonian Illinois
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.