"Your Corrupt Ways Had Finally Made You Blind": Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Use of "Ethnic Adjustments" in Death Penalty Cases of Defendants with Intellectual Disabilities

By Perlin, Michael L. | American University Law Review, July 1, 2016 | Go to article overview

"Your Corrupt Ways Had Finally Made You Blind": Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Use of "Ethnic Adjustments" in Death Penalty Cases of Defendants with Intellectual Disabilities


Perlin, Michael L., American University Law Review


INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the United States has finally recognized that an appalling number of wrongful convictions-most pointedly, in death penalty cases-have been the result of "scientific fraud."1 According to Professor Paul Giannelli, "forged fingerprints, faked autopsies, fals[ified] laboratory reports, and perjured testimony, including the falsification of credentials, have all been documented" in criminal trials.2 Such scientific fraud may result in the conviction and death sentence of an innocent person, or, at the least, may cover up such a mistake.3 Until recently, however, none of the ample literature on this forensic fraud has focused on fraudulent testimony in death penalty cases involving the IQ scores of defendants with intellectual disabilities.4 This gap in the scholarship has now changed.

In his recent masterful article, Professor Robert Sanger5 revealed that, since the Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. Virginia,6 some prosecution experts have endorsed the use of what have been characterized as "ethnic adjustments" in death penalty cases- artificially adding points to the IQ scores of minority death penalty defendants-so as to make such defendants, who would otherwise have been protected by Atkins and, later, by Hall v. Florida,7 eligible for the death penalty.8 Sanger accurately concluded that "ethnic adjustments" are not appropriate, clinically or logically, when calculating a defendant's IQ score for Atkins purposes."9 Further, he relied on epigenetics10 to demonstrate that environmental factors- such as childhood abuse, poverty, stress, and trauma-can result in lower IQ scores, and that "ethnic adjustments" make it more likely that such individuals-authentically "intellectually disabled"-will be sentenced and put to death.11

I agree with Professor Sanger, but I wish to shift the focus to the role of prosecutors who perpetuate the meretricious use of "ethnic adjustments" by endorsing and sanctioning the use of this "corrupt science."12 In recent work, I analyzed prosecutorial misconduct in death penalty cases where defendants had psychosocial ("mental health") disabilities, and I concluded that "prosecutors . . . violate the law and the codes of ethics with impunity, and are often rewarded for it."13 This Article shifts focus to the "ethnic adjustments" cases that Professor Sanger addressed, and I conclude that legal and moral corruption similarly permeates the behavior of some prosecutors in these cases.14

Part I reviews the disturbing frequency of prosecutorial misconduct in death penalty cases, specifically focusing on those involving defendants with mental disabilities. To do this, it looks carefully at the scandalous story of Dr. James Grigson-known morbidly as "Dr. Death"-who regularly testified fraudulently on behalf of the state at the penalty phase of death penalty cases, even after he lost his license to practice psychiatry, using, in virtually every case, "junk science" as the basis of his opinions.15 The subsequent part analyzes cases involving defendants with intellectual disabilities in which state experts testify in support of "ethnic adjustments" to IQ scores, issues that go beyond the scope of the Atkins and Hall decisions. Here, it considers three collateral questions that must be answered in the context of prosecutorial misconduct: (1) to what extent is it typical for prosecutors to reject the validity of expert testimony as to intellectual disability in se, as the district attorney (DA) did in State v. McCollum;16 (2) to what extent have prosecutors familiarized themselves with the standard manual on interpreting IQ scores that specifically rejects the use of ethnic adjustments in individual cases;17 and (3) have prosecutors been put on adequate notice that testimony is, simply, fraudulent, given the reality that professionals have uniformly rejected such adjustments?18

Part II focuses on the cases that Sanger discusses in his article-as well as other similar cases-and considers whether there is any meaningful distinction between what was done by the state in the cases on which Sanger focuses,19 and what was done in the cases involving fingerprints, autopsies, and laboratory reports, discussed some years ago by Professor Giannelli. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

"Your Corrupt Ways Had Finally Made You Blind": Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Use of "Ethnic Adjustments" in Death Penalty Cases of Defendants with Intellectual Disabilities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.