Fiscal Decentralization in Southeast Asia

By Schroeder, Larry | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

Fiscal Decentralization in Southeast Asia


Schroeder, Larry, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management


ABSTRACT. Fiscal decentralization is currently very popular and is being undertaken in many developing and transitional economies. This paper reviews the primary rationale for such policies and provides a short checklist of features useful in assessing a country's decentralization progress. The checklist is used to review the current status of decentralization efforts in the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia. The cases illustrate that the Philippines has progressed far towards a fiscally decentralized system, that both Indonesia and Thailand are now in midst of the process, and that Malaysia appears to have no intent of joining other countries in this policy effort.

INTRODUCTION

Relations between central and subnational governments in many Southeast Asian countries are in a state of flux. Although there are multiple dimensions to the changes in intergovernmental relations in these countries, the focus here is on the fiscal dimension, specifically fiscal decentralization.

As Oates (1999, p. 1120) states in his recent essay on the subject, "Fiscal decentralization is in vogue. Both in the industrialized and in the developing world, nations are turning to devolution to improve the performance of their public sectors." As reviewed in the following section, there are several arguments that support such changes. At the same time, there are certain factors that can limit the efficacy of such policies and that may impede the process in Southeast Asia; these too are noted below.

The main purpose of this paper is to review and compare the changes in intergovernmental fiscal arrangements that have been made or are being contemplated in several Southeast Asian countries.1 In order to provide some structure to that review, a checklist of policies generally associated with successful fiscal decentralization is proposed. The experiences of the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia with regard to decentralization are then reviewed.2 From that review we make some direct comparisons between the several countries and close the paper with several broad generalizations based on the events in the region.

FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION

As noted above, countries throughout the world have recently been engaged in altering central-local fiscal relations through decentralization of decision-making powers. For example, the World Bank reported "Out of the 75 developing and transitional countries with populations greater than 5 million, all but 12 claim to be embarked on some form of transfer of political power to local units of government" (Dillinger, 1994, p. 1). These policy initiatives are undertaken for a variety of purposes and take various forms. There is, for example, still considerable discussion of the relative merits of the exact form that such decentralization can and should take (e.g., administrative deconcentration, governmental devolution, delegation, or even privatization).3 Of particular interest here is the second of these alternatives-devolution of powers to fiscally autonomous local government units.4

Implications of Decentralization

Probably the most often quoted theoretical argument underlying the advantage of fiscal decentralization is Oates' (1972) "decentralization theorem."

For a public good-the consumption of which is defined over geographical subsets of the total population, and for which the costs of providing each level of output of the good in each jurisdiction are the same for the central or the respective local government-it will always be more efficient (or at least as efficient) for local governments to provide the Pareto-efficient levels of output for their respective jurisdictions than for the central government to provide any specified and uniform level of output across all jurisdictions.

The idea behind the theorem is that if preferences, i.e., demand, for public goods differ by location (and are reasonably homogeneous within a locality), efficiency gains are obtained by allowing each locality to provide the level of public goods that most closely reflects local demands. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fiscal Decentralization in Southeast Asia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.