Response To: "U.S. Tax Treatment of Foreign Source Income Earned in Developing Countries: Administration and Tax Treaty Issues"

By Rosenbloom, H. David | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

Response To: "U.S. Tax Treatment of Foreign Source Income Earned in Developing Countries: Administration and Tax Treaty Issues"


Rosenbloom, H. David, The George Washington International Law Review


Bruce Zagaris provides a highly useful summary of the administration and tax treaty issues bearing on U.S. taxation of foreign source income in developing countries. In U.S. Tax Treatment of Foreign Source Income Earned in Developing Countries: Administration and Tax Treaty Issues,1 Zagaris focuses on, but does not limit his analysis to, the various means available to the U.S. government to obtain information for litigating criminal and civil tax cases. Zagaris also addresses the current status of provisions aimed at obtaining assistance in the collection of taxes and in the use of extradition in tax matters. He concludes by calling for improved protection for taxpayer rights and for incentives to induce developing countries to cooperate with U.S. goals in these areas.

Zagaris' Article is all the more useful and interesting because it deals with subjects that are seldom brought together in one place for review. These subjects often escape the attention of tax experts, except to the extent they may be called upon to apply some specific rule or rules in particular factual and legal circumstances. Zagaris' approach offers a broad, general description of international tax administration in which individual developments are situated and can be assessed. For all of this, we should be grateful.

As a designated commentator on Zagaris' Article, however, I believe I am obliged to adopt an objective, even critical, eye, with a view to identifying points that could usefully be added, amplified, or rounded out in the picture he has painted for us. It is with that obligation in mind that I now address the features of the Article that seem to be most worthy of comment. There are three points that I would make: (1) the Article does not deal with important developments affecting tax information exchange agreements and, in particular, the implications of a basic change in legal standard set forth in the Model Convention on Exchange of Information drafted by the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD); (2) the Article does not offer concrete suggestions as to what the United States should do in the important areas of tax administration it describes; and (3) while situating individual developments in a broad framework, the Article does not explore the context in which one should approach the entire subject.

I. CRITIQUE OF CONTENT

A. Developments Affecting Tax Information Exchange Agreements

One can certainly excuse Zagaris for failing to deal with the OECD Model Convention on Exchange of Documentation as such, for the OECD is an organization comprised of developed countries. In contrast, both this Symposium2 and Zagaris' Article focus on the developing world. Most of the Article deals only with developing countries of the Caribbean and Latin America, but perhaps it is largely within that geographical vicinity that relevant activity has taken place in recent years. Most of the remaining activity has concerned, in one way or another, Switzerland and Luxembourg, countries that are hardly developing nations and whose absence here is understandable.

The problem is not the absence of developed countries in Article but, rather, the fact that the OECD potentially changes the rules of the game for everyone. The Model Exchange of Information Agreement (OECD Model Agreement)3 requires that a request for information depend on the ability of the requesting State, and not the requested State, to obtain the information. This is a change of great significance because, under the former standard, the requested State could refuse to supply information on the ground that its domestic laws did not allow the information to be obtained or supplied to domestic tax authorities.4 In domestic jurisdictions having strong laws in force that impede tax authorities from obtaining information, the "requested State" test gave rise to a complete defense even when there was a tax treaty or an information exchange agreement in place. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Response To: "U.S. Tax Treatment of Foreign Source Income Earned in Developing Countries: Administration and Tax Treaty Issues"
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.