The Magnitude of Random Appraisal Error in Commercial Real Estate Valuation

By Graff, Richard A.; Young, Michael S. | The Journal of Real Estate Research, January 1, 1999 | Go to article overview

The Magnitude of Random Appraisal Error in Commercial Real Estate Valuation


Graff, Richard A., Young, Michael S., The Journal of Real Estate Research


Abstract. Analysis of more than seven hundred pairs of simultaneous independent appraisals of institutional-grade commercial properties shows that the standard deviation of the random component of appraisal error is approximately 2%. Random appraisal error appears constant across both time and the institutional-grade investment universe, except during infrequent periods of real estate market gridlock. Most appraisal error is deterministic in nature, even though it usually appears random in routine cross-sectional analysis. Such appraisal error can be constrained and reduced by investment management control systems.

Introduction

A decade ago, real estate researchers began to consider the possibility that investment statistics derived from appraisal-based commercial real estate valuations might be much less satisfactory measures of real estate investment performance than corresponding statistics derived from transactions in the United States stock and bond markets. The main source for concern was considered to be random appraisal error, since earlier studies of appraisal error in the residential housing market had suggested that typical appraisal error is at least 10% of asset capitalization and that most residential appraisal error is random.1

Since researchers did not have access to large numbers of commercial real estate appraisals to aid in formulating and testing hypotheses about appraisal valuation behavior, empirical investigation of commercial real estate appraisal error sources and their effect on real estate investment statistics was not possible. Accordingly, researchers used accepted beliefs about residential real estate appraisal accuracy and aggregate National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) statistics to justify assumptions about the magnitude and random behavior of commercial real estate appraisal error.2

Unfortunately, in the case of institutional-grade real estate these assumptions neglect two major differences between commercial property and residential housing: institutions purchase property primarily for cash flow and secondarily for capital appreciation, so the hedonic measures institutions apply to value commercial property are more uniform than the hedonic measures by which homeowners value residential housing; and institutional real estate managers usually make real estate investment decisions on behalf of institutional investors, raising the possibility of agency-based (nonrandom) contributions to appraisal error usually absent in the case of residential housing.3

This suggests two likely consequences: commercial real estate appraisal error contains both random and nonrandom components, and the average magnitude of random appraisal error in the case of commercial real estate is smaller than the average magnitude of random residential housing appraisal error. It follows that any description of the effect of appraisal error on investment statistics should be more complicated than suggested by previous studies, since random and nonrandom appraisal error components affect sample means, variances and correlations in very different ways.

In the absence of access to a fairly large database of commercial real estate appraisals, it has been impossible for most researchers to determine whether the magnitude of random appraisal error is large enough to have a material impact on sample real estate investment statistics. However, even if such access were available, it would only enable researchers to estimate the magnitude of total appraisal error. Access to appraisal data alone would not enable researchers to compare the relative importance of contributions from random and nonrandom error components.

The magnitude of random appraisal error can be determined empirically if an appraisal database for institutional-grade commercial real estate can be located that includes at least two simultaneous independent appraisals whenever an appraisal valuation is updated. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Magnitude of Random Appraisal Error in Commercial Real Estate Valuation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.