Regulation and Accreditation in Professional Psychology: Facilitators? Safeguards? Threats?

By Edwards, Henry P. | Canadian Psychology, January 1994 | Go to article overview

Regulation and Accreditation in Professional Psychology: Facilitators? Safeguards? Threats?


Edwards, Henry P., Canadian Psychology


During the past 25 years, I have been involved in accreditation and regulatory issues from several perspectives including those of psychology professor, university administrator, accreditation site visitor, member of a psychology regulatory board, and participant in associations of psychologists. The following remarks are intended to be personal rather than scholarly, and to stimulate dialogue and debate rather than to propose unique solutions to the issues raised. They are an attempt to elucidate my viewpoint that regulation and accreditation in professional psychology, when correctly understood and implemented with sensitivity, are complementary to each other and beneficial to the psychology profession.

The Regulation of Professional Psychology

According to standard dictionary definitions, regulation means control (Sykes, 1976). To regulate the psychology profession, therefore, means to control title and/or practice within parameters laid down by provincial or state law.

In Canada and the United States, the practice of psychology is regulated by regulatory boards (cf. ASPPB, 1993), which are mandated to implement and administer the relevant Acts of their provincial or state legislatures. Boards may be appointed or elected, and often include both psychologists and lay members.

The key purposes of regulation in psychology by provincial or state boards typically include:

1. Protection of the public served by psychologists from incompetent or unethical practitioners;

2. Determination of entry requirements for registration or licensure of individual psychologists;

3. Development, adoption, monitoring and enforcement of ethics and professional conduct standards to be observed by registered or licensed psychologists;

4. Periodic review of registrants' or licensees' competence to continue to practice as psychologists;

5. Complaint and discipline procedures and enforcement, both with reference to the professional work of registered or licensed psychologists, and to the work of non - psychologists presenting themselves to their clients as psychologists;

6. Informing the public about the regulation of psychology; and

7. Periodic review and updating of the standards and procedures according to which the profession is regulated by the board.

In other words, regulatory boards exist for the protection of the public served by psychologists. To the extent that they succeed inthis task, as a by - product they enhance the status and facilitate the continuing evolution of psychology as a profession.

The Accreditation of Professional Psychol - ogy Programs Accreditation of psychology programs (cf. CPA, 1991; APA, 1986) refers to a process whereby a nongovernmental association of psychologists:

1. Establishes a set of criteria by which to define and describe high quality doctoral or internship programs;

2. Promotes its accreditation model and criteria as exemplars of high quality education and training, and encourages programs to evolve toward full compliance with the criteria by means of self - study;

3. Sets up procedures for the review of programs which, on a voluntary basis, seek formal recognition as programs that meet the accreditation criteria;

4. Publicly announces which programs have been granted accreditation to the psychology community, the academic community and students or prospective students; and

5. Periodically reviews and updates the accreditation criteria and procedures.

In Canada and the United States, accreditation is voluntary, self - regulating, and traditionally restricted to professional education and training programs. When implemented collegially and objectively, it provides valuable information about the nature and quality of education and training programs, and it contributes to the evolution of doctoral and internship programs in professional psychology by its ongoing insistence on self - assessment followed by external peer review. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Regulation and Accreditation in Professional Psychology: Facilitators? Safeguards? Threats?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.