Render Not Unto Seizure

By Bovard, James | The American Spectator, September 1999 | Go to article overview

Render Not Unto Seizure

Bovard, James, The American Spectator

The GOP must choose between law and enforcement.

The Justice Department last year confiscated 42,454 cars, boats, houses, stacks of cash, and other items of private property-booty valued at nearly $605 million. Federal agents can seize a person's property by invoking more than two hundred different federal statutes involving everything from wildlife to carrying cash out of the country to playing poker for cash with friends and relatives. The vast majority of people whose property is seized is never formally charged with a crime. In criminal cases, the government must prove a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil asset forfeiture, the only thing federal agents need is a hearsay accusation, mere gossip, or rumor. Often forfeitures are based on the word of confidential informants (frequently ex-convicts), who receive up to 25 percent of the value of any property the government seizes based on their accusations.

Now Congress and the Clinton administration are baffling over the scope of government's power to confiscate private property. The House of Representatives has rebuked the administration and its allies on the issue by a surprising margin, yet the Senate seems far more seizurefriendly. And the White House is doing all it can to expand federal power in this area. This battle also highlights a major fault line within the Republican Party, between those who cater to law enforcement and those who believe government power must be limited.

Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) has been pushing to reform forfeiture since 1993.

This year, he finally got his bill through the House-aided by a diverse band of co-sponsors including Rep. Bob Barr (RGa.), Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), and backed by organizations ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the National Rifle Association. Hyde's bill would shift the burden of proof to the government in forfeiture cases, abolish the requirement that people post cash bonds before suing to regain their property, and institute other procedural changes to make the system more equitable.

Hyde's bill evoked hysteria among American law enforcement. Rep. Asa Hutchinson (R-Ark.) introduced a substitute "reform" bill that would have actually greatly increased the government's power to confiscate property. Most of Hutchinson's substitute bill was written by Justice Department lawyers.

During the floor debate on Hyde's bill on June 24, Hutchinson complained:

"How does disarming law enforcement fit into the war on drugs?" Thus, decreasing a DEA agent's power to seize your car is the equivalent of taking away his sidearm.

Some of the opponents of Hyde's bill were indignant that the House would even stoop to consider such a bill and mention some well-known forfeiture outrages. Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) raised the caliber of the debate with a gem of congressional logic: "The abuses that exist, and they do, they represent the straw man in this debate because indeed we all want to do away with the abuses." Thus, because all members of Congress must be presumed to wish that abuses did not occur, it is unfair and irrational to actually consider seizure abuses when seeking to reform the law.

Rep. Ed Bryant (R-Tenn.) explained why money was so often seized from those with no drugs on them: "The way the system works in this is when there are couriers...they either have the money or they have the drugs, but they do not have them both.... So we either find drugs on the person or money on the person, depending which way they are going. Thus, the fact that someone is caught with lots of money but no drugs miraculously proves that they are a drug courier."

Hyde's bill would allow judges the option of appointing counsel for indigent citizens who seek to challenge forfeiture actions. (The cost of hiring a lawyer to fight a seizure is widely estimated to be at least $5,ooo-often more than the value of the goods seized. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Render Not Unto Seizure


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.