Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory // Review

By Grant, Judith S. | Resources for Feminist Research, Spring/Summer 1995 | Go to article overview

Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory // Review


Grant, Judith S., Resources for Feminist Research


Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory Judith Grant New York, NY: Routledge, 1993.

Reviewed by Brenda L. Beagan Department of Anthropology and Sociology University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC

Judith Grant's Fundamental Feminism offers a highly readable analysis of early feminist theorizing, a critical examination of feminist standpoint theories and feminist epistemologies, and an overview of current explorations in postmodern feminism. In each area she traces three central concepts, which she calls "core concepts," that emerged from early feminist writing and politics, and which she argues have become foundational for feminist theory. These concepts are: (1) Woman; (2) experience; and (3) personal politics.

Grant argues that a notion central to early feminism was that women were oppressed as Women, a category that must "include all women or risk dissolution." However, the acknowledgment that women constituted a distinct social group required some basis for connection. Thus developed the idea that there was a female nature shared by all women, at all times across all cultures. As Grant points out (and as many others have pointed out), this was essentialist, ethnocentric and ahistorical.

Equally problematic for Grant is the core concept of "experience." Early feminists redefined oppression subjectively to mean anything women experienced as oppressive; the measure of any ideology, theory or generalization was whether it matched women's experiences. The major problems Grant identifies with this core concept are that experience is impossible to discern authentically, and that experience leaves some women out. This is especially problematic when whole categories of people say, "That does not match our experience." Grant's primary concern seems to be that "experience" is linked to the universalistic category "Woman," assuming that all women share common experiences. However, it is not clear whether the problems Grant identifies would remain if it were disconnected from a universal Woman. While I agree with Grant that essentialist and universalizing understandings of "experience" are problematic, it strikes me as very dangerous to ground feminist politics, theory and action in anything other than women's experiences.

The third core concept, "personal politics," arose from the epistemological position that women's experiential knowledge was the only valid knowledge. The notion of personal politics was that the things women experienced as profoundly personal in fact came directly from political relations between men and women in a system of male domination -- patriarchy. And since the oppression of Woman was transcultural and transhistorical, patriarchy had also to exist across cultures and across time. Grant points out that this made it difficult even to imagine any relations between men and women that would not be based on domination and subordination.

Grant examines how these core concepts are used in many different versions of feminist theory, including socialist feminism, feminist standpoint theories and theorizing by women of colour. While she raises many valid criticisms, she also tends to characterize an entire category of theorizing with the flaws that may be true of a single theorist. Furthermore, some of her criticisms seem to be based on misunderstandings of the theories she is critiquing. At the very least, in searching for her core concepts, I think she has at times oversimplified complex theories.

Nonetheless, in establishing the existence of the three core concepts in a wide range of feminist theories, from early radical feminism to contemporary postmodern feminism, Judith Grant shows a greater continuity and connection in feminist theorizing than most feminists tend to be aware of. Furthermore, she has given many of these theorists, especially early radical feminists, a more generous reading than I have seen in a long time. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory // Review
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.