The Sense of Entitlement to Violate the Law: Legal Disobedience as a Public versus a Private Reaction

By Rattner, Arye; Yagil, Dana et al. | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

The Sense of Entitlement to Violate the Law: Legal Disobedience as a Public versus a Private Reaction


Rattner, Arye, Yagil, Dana, Sherman-Segal, Camelia, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


This study examined citizens' sense of entitlement to violate the law as a public response to an action of state authorities or as a private response to the harmful behavior of another person. Questionnaires examining sense of entitlement to violate the law, moral reasoning, political orientation and attitudes toward the law were administered to 329 Israeli students. The results show that respondents felt more entitled to violate the law as a public action than as an act of personal retaliation. Public law violation directed toward authorities was found to be most strongly related to political orientation. Nevertheless private law violation directed toward another person is related to the absence of a sense of obligation to comply with the law and to a lack of trust in legal authorities. Moral reasoning and religiosity were found to be indirectly related to both types of law violation. The results are discussed in regard to different types of triggers for law violation.

The obligation of a citizen to comply with state laws has intrigued scholars from various disciplines. Philosophers have argued for and against the obligation to comply with state laws that contradict an individual's private conscience. Social scientists have explored the factors relating to the commitment to the rule of law such as moral reasoning (Kohlberg, 1969), normative and instrumental compliance (Tyler, 1990), and legal culture (Bierbrauer, 1994; Gibson & Caldeira, 1996). In what situations do citizens who consider themselves law- abiding feel that they have the right to violate the law? Is there a difference between the violation of laws as a public reaction to the acts of state authorities and as a private reaction to another person's acts? This study explores the relationship of personal beliefs and attitudes toward the law with the sense of entitlement to violate state laws as a public or private reaction.

PERSONAL VALUES: MORAL REASONING, RELIGIOSITY, AND POLITICAL ORIENTATION

Kohlberg (1969) described several stages of moral reasoning representing the developmental changes in the individual's view of authority and the duty to comply with its laws. According to Kohlberg's theory, a person's view of moral principles is likely to be related to the sense of entitlement to violate state laws in cases when laws and moral beliefs come into conflict. Research has shown that values relating to religious beliefs also affect acceptance of the rule of law (Bierbrauer, 1994; Gibson & Caldeira, 1996). In Israel, lower levels of commitment to legal obedience were found among ultraorthodox Jews compared to the general Jewish population (Rattner, Yagil, & Pedhazur, 2001; Yagil & Rattner, 2002).

The relationship between legal obedience and political orientation has been examined with regard to the moderating effect of moral reasoning. For example, several studies show that right-wing ideology is related to conventional moral reasoning in which the rule of law is highly respected, whereas left-wing ideology is related to higher level principled reasoning drawing on abstract principles such as democracy and human rights (Lind, Sandberger & Bargel, 1985; Nassi, Abramowitz & Yousmans, 1983; Simplson, 1994). However, other studies have demonstrated that conventional and postconventional reasoning are found among both right- and left-wing voters (Elmer, Renwick & Malone, 1983; Sparks & Durkin, 1987). Yagil and Rattner (2002) found lower levels of acceptance of the rule of law among right-wing voters compared to left-wing voters in Israel. In most studies conducted in Europe and the US, the distinction between left and right parallels the distinction between liberal and conservative, based mainly on socioeconomic issues. In Israel, the distinction between left and right is more strongly related to political issues emphasizing matters of security (Ventura & Shamir, 1988). One can thus assume that in Israel, too, the distinction between left and right political ideologies will be mirrored in the interpretation of various other issues related to justice, equality, human rights, and state and religion. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Sense of Entitlement to Violate the Law: Legal Disobedience as a Public versus a Private Reaction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.