The Essential Contributions of Mass Communication Programs

By Carter, Richard F. | The Journalism Educator, Winter 1995 | Go to article overview

The Essential Contributions of Mass Communication Programs

Carter, Richard F., The Journalism Educator

The future of mass communication programs should depend on the educational contributions they make. But other circumstances arise, such as budget worries. When the axe recently fell on several programs, the AEJMC president asked: "Are journalism/mass communication programs becoming an endangered species?"(1) As journalism educators, we have an abiding concern for program content and quality, but we can not be blind to our place in higher education. We must ask ourselves some searching questions.

We have gone from schools of journalism to schools of journalism and mass communication--sometimes to schools of communication that embrace us along with speech and drama. We have also gone from a professional concern that drew students whose interests lay in public affairs and creative expression to an ever-expanding field where most students seem to have pedestrian vocational interests.

Was it wrong to go from profession to field? One can only agree enthusiastically with Marvin(2) that communication is a great idea for a field. But was it right to become more field than profession?

Should we return to those J-School days of yesteryear? Should we drop advertising, public relations, and media studies? Were we wrong to ever extend beyond editorial journalism? Were we wrong to venture into the realm of social science, even though mass communication figures increasingly in our working, leisure, cultural, and political lives? Has mass communication--and journalism--become a minor regency within an evergrowing realm of communication?

But is any of this the crux of our problem? Is this why our programs appear vulnerable to administrative cost-cutting? Is it not the way of our contemporary world that the economy and jobs take precedence over the polity and profession...that advertising and public relations are the principal mass communication careers of the future for our graduates, that mass media have become too important not to be analyzed and criticized?

And how much of a profession were we? Those in editorial practice-the professionals-were divided as to whether a journalism degree or a liberal arts degree was the better preparation for an editorial career. Such indecision is hardly the hallmark of a profession.

Did we do something wrong in cultivating this field--or did we fail to do something right? The two are not necessarily the same. Did we make a mistake becoming a field...or did we fail by not carrying on further, by not becoming more of a discipline? We have not lacked for a vision of becoming a scientific discipline,(3) and there is precedent enough for that. Just as medicine has its science and practice, so might we. There is even metaphoric parallel. Communication is, as we know too well, often called upon to cure our ills.

Why did we evolve from profession to field but then not develop into a discipline? Why are our scholars more interested in staking out territorial claims in limitless terrain than discovering and organizing theoretical principles scientifically? Why do we have more to say about mass communications effects than we do about general principles of mass communication effectiveness?

Starting with the universities themselves as organizations, and extending to the putative "world community," there is no shortage of collective entities and would-be collective entities that could strongly benefit from more effective mass communication. For example, even if the information superhighway succeeds in yielding universal connectivity, this will hardly begin to solve our mass communication problems. (It may produce more problems than it solves, given its likely development as an economic venue, not as a societal and political instrument. Access, noise, and pollution problems are already evident with just a modest degree of connectivity.)

Social science

But what do collective enterprises like the university and the country find when they look to the field of mass communication? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Essential Contributions of Mass Communication Programs


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.