A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Methid and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity

By Peterman, G. W. | Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, September 1999 | Go to article overview

A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Methid and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity


Peterman, G. W., Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society


A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Method and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity. By Jeffrey T. Reed. JSNTSup 136. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1997, 525 pp., $80.00.

Reed says concerning his work: "To my knowledge, it is the first monograph-- sized attempt at a New Testament discourse analysis based on systemic linguistics" (p. 24). Reed builds on the systemic-functional theories of M. A. K. Halliday, hoping to present "the framework of Halliday's theory in a readable and usable manner for the New Testament scholar" (p. 7). He applies this theory to the literary integrity of Philippians.

The book has two parts. The first part, "Discourse Analysis as New Testament Hermeneutic," divides into two chapters. Chapter one provides an introduction to discourse analysis, including a sketch of its history. Chapter two presents "A Model of New Testament Discourse Analysis." For those unfamiliar with discourse analysis or systemic linguistics, part one is worth reading, but the reading is very difficult. Though Reed seeks to present systemic linguistics in a readable and usable manner for the NT scholar, scholar and layperson both are likely to find this section laborious reading as they try to make sense of new (or differently used) terms such as cotext, rheme, thematisation, texture, slots, fillers, meronymy, temporal deixis, ideational, register, virtual system and transitivity. One cannot read through these first two chapters; one must study or gain almost nothing.

I must admit I found parts of Reed's first section to be quite tedious, as he delved into the obvious, such as that NT writers "are not readily available to be questioned regarding their assumptions and intentions" ( pp. 39-40) and that context limits word choice so that we cannot complete the statement I gulped down with the phrase a dog running through the park. At times hermeneutical guidelines are wrapped with different words and presented as fresh insights, even though a careful reader can find some of the same hermeneutical instruction being given in Plutarch's How a Young man Should Study Poetry (ca. AD 50-120). I do not imply that discourse analysis is without value, only that its insights are sometimes presented as new when in fact they are actually sharpening of old insights.

Part two is a "Discourse Analysis of Philippians" and has four chapters, titled "The Debate over the Literary Integrity of Philippians," "The Structure of Philippians," "The Texture of Philippians" and "Conclusion." Part two is the strength of Reed's work. In these chapters he is careful, detailed and insightful, virtually providing the reader with an introduction to ancient letter writing and epistolary theory. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Methid and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.