Dangerous Liaisons: Trust, Distrust, and Information Technology in American Work Organizations

By Baba, Marietta L. | Human Organization, Fall 1999 | Go to article overview

Dangerous Liaisons: Trust, Distrust, and Information Technology in American Work Organizations


Baba, Marietta L., Human Organization


This paper employs an inductive, natural-systems approach to explore the complex social and economic factors whose interaction generate trust and distrust between individuals, subunits, and firms in American corporations. The objective of this investigation is to gain a better understanding of the role of interpersonal trust and distrust on the implementation and use of new information technologies in organizational settings. The focus of the investigation is work-group control of information flow across organizational boundaries under conditions of trust and distrust, and the consequences of advanced information technology for such information-control practices. A central finding is that more powerful parties often try to force a shift in the medium of information exchange to gain greater control in specific hierarchical relationships. When these changes threaten the quality or security of information required by less powerful parties, resistance is the result. The discussion suggests that deployment of advanced information technology without the application of local knowledge of social interrelationships increases the risk of implementation failure.

Key words: trust, distrust, risk, information, information technology, electronic communication

Introduction

Relations of interpersonal trust in formal organizations are an emerging area of interest in the social and organizational sciences. Since economic transactions are embedded within networks of social relationships, the characteristics of those relationships-such as trust and its opposite, distrust-have a direct bearing on the effectiveness and efficiency of instrumental exchanges in organizational settings (Granovetter 1985). Trust between various organizational actors (including trust between individuals within a work group, in separate units within a firm, or in different firms) appears to confer a competitive advantage by enabling more effective cooperation and coordination among parties to an economic transaction (Fukuyama 1995). Where there is trust, different parties can enter into collaborative relationships more quickly, sustain coordinated action by making mutual adjustments, and learn from each other, rather than being bogged down for days, weeks, or months in formulating cumbersome contracts or building elaborate hierarchies that enforce a limited form of cooperation that ultimately may interfere with learning (Thompson 1967; Alter and Hage 1993). Organizational scholars and practicing managers alike have discovered that many economic objectivesfrom achieving success in mergers, acquisitions, and partnerships (Johnson and Lawrence 1988; Dodgson 1993; Kanter 1994) to creating new types of "virtual" organizations (Handy 1995) to sustaining the long-term economic growth and development of nations (Fukuyama 1995)-are furthered by high levels of trust in social and organizational relationships.

Prompted by competition from firms based in Japan and elsewhere in the East-where reciprocal bonds of obligation facilitate trust and cooperation between individuals and groups (e.g., Brunner et al. 1989)-American corporations have belatedly recognized the value of a trust-based "collaborative advantage" (Kanter 1994). In response, U.S. firms have adopted a number of new structures and management practices that attempt to build trust as a means to improve coordination and cooperation among parties representing different interests (e.g., employees and managers, managers of different subunits, firms and their customers, buyers and suppliers). These structures and practices include self-directed and/or cross-functional work teams, total quality management, employee involvement, and category management (i.e., manufacturer-retailer partnerships), among others (Aoki 1990).

At the same time, American corporations also have pursued other pathways to a "collaborative advantage" that do not necessarily rely upon trust. Probably the most prominent of these are new information technologies such as electronic data interchange (EDI); computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and computer-aided engineering (CAE); shared databases; and computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) tools. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Dangerous Liaisons: Trust, Distrust, and Information Technology in American Work Organizations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.