The History and Historians of Civil War Arkansas

By Bailey, Anne J.; Sutherland, Daniel E. | The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, Autumn 1999 | Go to article overview

The History and Historians of Civil War Arkansas

Bailey, Anne J., Sutherland, Daniel E., The Arkansas Historical Quarterly

THE APPROACH OF A NEW CENTURY is reason enough to take stock of any historical field, but such an assessment seems especially appropriate for the Civil War. To the casual observer, the Civil War years remain one of the constants in American life. Everyone knows Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis, Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, Vicksburg and Gettysburg. The war in Arkansas had its own players and events, but the names are equally recognizable to many Arkansans: Isaac Murphy and Henry Rector, Frederick Steele and Sterling Price, Pea Ridge and Jenkins' Ferry. Yet there is more, much more, to the Arkansas story than those familiar battles and leaders. Modern historians view nearly every aspect of the war quite differently than did scholars of a century ago. Social and economic issues now challenge traditional military and political themes for dominance, and the very best work offers a smoothly blended interdisciplinary perspective on the causes and progress of the war. Early "Confederate" histories of the conflict have given way to less ideological interpretations. Indeed, the historiography of Civil War Arkansas has become complicated enough to merit some sorting out and to invite speculation about the direction of future scholarship.1

It all began a hundred years ago, when John M. Harrell published the first significant work about the war in Arkansas. Entitled simply Arkansas, Harrell's book appeared as part of the landmark Confederate Military History, edited by Clement A. Evans. Like most contributors to this multivolume set, which included a military/political narrative of the war for each Confederate state, Harrell had served in the conflict and become active in the United Confederate Veterans. Born in North Carolina, he had emigrated to Arkansas in 1849, at age twenty-one, to practice law. He rose to the grade of colonel during the war and saw action in Virginia, Mississippi, and Arkansas. His history of the war, like those of most nineteenth-century chroniclers-northem and southern-was notably partisan. Yet, for all that, Harrell managed a surprisingly balanced tone. He certainly produced something more than a personal reminiscence, and while we have no evidence to show what sources he used in his research, he more than likely consulted Century Magazine's "Battles and Leaders" series and the government's recently published War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.2

Harrell's work stood unchallenged until the 1920s, when Thomas S. Staples and David Y. Thomas produced the first scholarly accounts of the war. Staples, a professor at Hendrix College and former student of William A. Dunning at Columbia University, expressed more interest in Reconstruction than the war. Yet the fact that Arkansas had early on been occupied by the Union army, thus allowing Abraham Lincoln to experiment with reconstruction policies in the state, made the prelude to that postwar political struggle an important part of the state's wartime experience. Staples devoted nearly a fifth of his 1923 book, Reconstruction in Arkansas, to the war years. Reflecting the beliefs of his mentor and the so-called "Dunning school" of historiography, he characterized the state's unionist government as inept and interpreted the postwar era as a dark period in the South's history. Scalawags, northern carpetbaggers, and southern blacks conspired, he said, to strip former rebels of their rights and to establish corrupt state governments that mirrored the Gilded Age cesspool of Washington, DC.3

Three years later, David Thomas, formerly a professor at Hendrix but by then teaching at the University of Arkansas, filled in the rest of the picture with his tremendously influential Arkansas in War and Reconstruction, 1861-1874. Interestingly, Thomas had been reluctant to write the book. The son of a Confederate veteran, the Kentucky-born Thomas was, nonetheless, "very much adverse to war." His pacifism nearly led him to reject the project, and he became downright apprehensive upon learning that the Arkansas division of the United Daughters of the Confederacy would "assist" with his research. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The History and Historians of Civil War Arkansas


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.