Rediscovering Orson Welles

By Benamou, Catherine | Michigan Quarterly Review, Fall 1999 | Go to article overview

Rediscovering Orson Welles

Benamou, Catherine, Michigan Quarterly Review

Orson Welles, Shakespeare, and Popular Culture. By Michael Anderegg. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999. Pp. 213. $42.50 hb; $16.50 pb.

One of the most heartening developments in the study of individual filmmakers (as Orson Welles preferred to call them) over the past decade has been the emergence of an international community of Orson Welles scholars dedicated to serious inquiry into the full trajectory and many dimensions of a career that lasted nearly sixty years and bridged four continents.1 The synthetic yield of this scholarship-epitomized by some of the premises and research tacks adopted by Michael Anderegg in his new book-has been threefold. First, it has posthumously refurbished Welles's public image in a manner that refutes his trite reduction to a spendthrift, flamboyant, and unpredictable genius who shocked the multitudes with his 1938 Halloween "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast and his controversial film Citizen Kane (1941). Recent, more carefully researched accounts of Welles-at-work have pointed to his erudition, versatility, humanism, and perseverance as an artist and activist; his particular skill and inspiration as an orchestrator of talent and collaborator, as well as maverick auteur; his passion for improvisation; and his propensity for recycling script ideas and strategies from previous projects, both completed and unfinished, in an effort to understand the creative process linking his works.2

Second, in making a critical and historical reassessment of Welles's oeuvre and its periodic disruptions, this scholarship has ventured through and beyond the expressionist/realist, romantic/ modernist, vanguard/industrial dichotomies so frequently applied to his films, to consider the complex relationship between different phases of his work and broader sociopolitical, technical, and stylistic formations in the twentieth century. Here the assumption is that Welles's projects are necessarily differentiated not only according to the various media in which he worked (radio, theater, film), but by the specific historical and cultural circumstances in which they were produced. The "high" points and "low" points that have customarily been invoked to configure his ski-slope shaped career have become subject to reevaluation as a result.

At the same time, a new recognition of the transhistorical and poly-philosophical currents within his work (Welles was a creature of the Enlightenment and the Renaissance, as well as FDR's New Deal) has brought into relief the nature of Welles's ambivalence toward modernity, and his ongoing concern with the great responsibilities and difficulties (financial, discursive, logistical) associated with using audiovisual media simultaneously as a form of personal expression and social communication. This concern was only intensified. by his cosmopolitan approach to projects undertaken in disparate settings, from Harlem, Acapulco, and Belfast to Fortaleza, Madrid, and Hollywood. Moreover, the shared assumption that, to quote Anderegg, "the gaps, omissions, and quirks of Welles's texts call for some kind of answering intelligence" has led to an identification of the plural, rather than singular factors behind Welles's customary difficulty in securing support from producers and the press. Paradoxically, this has all had the effect of removing Welles from the pedestal and the historical master control panel, of seeing the extent to which, his individual flaws and talents notwithstanding, he faced, together with other nonconformist yet commercially viable filmmakers, a host of external constraints and pressures, not the least of which were the vertical integration of the Hollywood studio system and the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Third, the added attention to the less visible-and often underestimated-portions of Welles's output has permitted a more intricate analysis of its intertextual dimensions, and thus, a less fractured understanding of its ideological and aesthetic turns. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Rediscovering Orson Welles


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.