Understanding the Stability-Change Paradox: Insights from the Evolutionary, Adaptation, and Institutionalization Perspectives

By Park, Daewoo; Krishnan, Hema A. | International Journal of Management, September 2003 | Go to article overview

Understanding the Stability-Change Paradox: Insights from the Evolutionary, Adaptation, and Institutionalization Perspectives


Park, Daewoo, Krishnan, Hema A., International Journal of Management


Examining the paradoxical nature of organization and management, three prevailing organization-environment relations and organizational change perspectives are discussed: the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives. Their implications for paradoxical phenomena (in particular, stability and change) in intraand inter-organizational structure are also discussed. Finally, an integrative perspective is suggested for future organizational theories and perspectives.

Introduction

This study explores the implications of the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives for managing the stability-change paradox in intraand inter-organizational structure. Organization-environment relations and organizational change have a long history in the organizational literature. Studied separately at first, they are the main ideas underlying the main perspective in modem organizational analysis (Bedeian, 1987).

Compared to earlier studies that focused on stability, recent theorists have increasingly focused on change and/or the continuous vacillation between stability and change (Burrell and Morgan, 1979). Two sources of organizational change have been widely debated. Some theories emphasize internally driven change (Van de Ven and Poole, 1988), while others emphasize externally driven change (McKelvey, 1982). Externally focused theories consider change a deterministic (environmentally determined) phenomena while internally focused theories adopt a voluntaristic (proactive) perspective. While closely related to the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives, these theories generate a number of paradoxical requirements (e.g., action-structure, stability-change, voluntarism-determinism) that need to be resolved before organization-environment relations and organizational change can be fully understood.

After discussing the paradoxical characteristics of intra- and inter-organizational structure, implications from the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives will be presented to better explain stability and change in intra- and inter-organizational structure.

Paradoxical Characteristics in Intra- and Inter-organizational Structure

Van de Ven and Poole (1988: p.22) define a paradox as "a real or apparent contradiction between equally well-based assumptions or conclusions." This paper explores the determinism-voluntarism paradox and the stability-change paradox form the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives. It lays the groundwork for developing a theory of organizational change that integrates the findings of research from these three perspectives by clarifying each perspective's implications for the stability-change paradox. The next section builds upon the above discussion of organizational paradoxes by addressing the implications for stability and change inherent in or explicitly stated by theorists from the evolutionary, adaptation, and institutionalization perspectives.

The Evolutionary Perspective

Evolution can be thought of as a process of successive differentiation and integration. Evolutionary or life-cycle aspects of organizational phenomena have been studied by many organizational researchers. Generally, they have proposed three different organizational evolution frameworks: 1) Ecological models which emphasize change across populations of organizations as the result of net mortality driven by processes of environmental selection (Hannan and Freeman, 1989; McKelvey, 1982); 2) Adaptation models which emphasize incremental change and moving equilibria as more effective organizations adapt to environmental threats and opportunities (Aldrich, 1979); and 3) Transformational models which focus on metamorphic changes in organizations (Miller, 1982).

From those approaches to organizational evolution, Tushman and Romanelli (1985) developed a model of organizational evolution and argued that organizations evolve through the interaction of internal convergent forces for stability and external forces for change as mediated by executive leadership. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Understanding the Stability-Change Paradox: Insights from the Evolutionary, Adaptation, and Institutionalization Perspectives
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.