The Legal Effect of College and University Policies Prohibiting Romantic Relationships between Students and Professors

By Hutchens, Neal | Journal of Law and Education, October 2003 | Go to article overview

The Legal Effect of College and University Policies Prohibiting Romantic Relationships between Students and Professors


Hutchens, Neal, Journal of Law and Education


I. INTRODUCTION

In recent years increasing numbers of higher education institutions have implemented policies addressing consensual sexual or romantic relationships between professors and students.1 Representative of the trend, the University of California system, which includes ten campuses, joined the growing list of institutions and systems with policies in July 2003 by prohibiting faculty members from engaging in consensual amorous relationships with students they supervise or are likely to supervise.2 The well-publicized resignation of the dean of the University of California at Berkely's Boalt Hall School of Law following accusations of sexual harassment by a former student3 helped spur implementation of the policy.4 Though admitting a lapse in judgment, the former dean claimed the encounter with the student was consensual.5 The topic of sexual or romantic relationships between professors and students raises sensitive questions and legal concerns regarding the appropriate institutional role, if any, in regulating such relationships, and the following article considers issues related to enactment of consensual relationship policies.

Part II of the article examines motivations prompting colleges and universities to adopt consensual relationship policies. In addition to concerns with the integrity of the academic process and the promotion of ethical conduct among professors, use of policies by institutions represents an effort to provide greater insulation from liability for sexual harassment. The section also discusses criticisms raised by opponents of consensual relationship policies. Significant variations exist among policies and analysis of standards at selected institutions and Part III allows consideration of the continuum of standards available.6 As more colleges and universities enact consensual relationship guidelines, the chance of legal objections increases-especially in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas7-and Part IV contemplates the form of potential legal challenges. Part V considers the usefulness of consensual relationship policies in reducing institutional liability for sexual harassment. Despite practical difficulties in designing a workable consensual relationship policy and concerns with university officials unduly meddling in the private affairs of consenting adults, the article concludes, in Part VI, that courts would likely uphold the authority of institutions to enact consensual relationship policies, especially those limited to when a professor exercises some form of supervisory or academic authority over a student.

II. INSTITUTIONAL MOTIVATIONS TO ENACT CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIP POLICIES

Several impulses lead colleges and universities to enact consensual relationship policies. A key rationale for institutions to create policies stems from a desire to protect the integrity of a school's educational mission. Institutions not only seek to protect the students potentially involved in such relationships but third parties as well. Avoiding legal liability for sexual harassment represents another significant reason compelling colleges and universities to put consensual relationship policies in place. Protection of the reputation and image of a school, especially following negative publicity connected to the existence of relationships between professors and students, provides an additional incentive for colleges and universities to adopt a policy. While useful to assess criticisms aimed at consensual relationship rules, consideration of the reasons behind implementation of the policies also helps predict the response of courts faced with legal challenges to such standards.

An important motivation for institutions to design consensual relationship standards stems from a desire on the part of schools to protect their educational missions by promoting appropriate standards of professional conduct among faculty in their dealings with students. The University of Iowa's policy states, for example, that "[t]he integrity of the University's educational mission is promoted by professionalism that derives from mutual trust and respect in faculty-student relationships. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Legal Effect of College and University Policies Prohibiting Romantic Relationships between Students and Professors
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.