A Queston of Intent: Choice of Law and the International Arbitration Agreement

By Thrope, Jessica | Dispute Resolution Journal, November 1999 | Go to article overview

A Queston of Intent: Choice of Law and the International Arbitration Agreement


Thrope, Jessica, Dispute Resolution Journal


Parties to international transactions often include a choice of law clause as part of their arbitration agreement. This article discusses whether the express law chosen by the parties to an international contract governs the procedural rules of arbitration, or is limited to the substantive rights of the parties under their agreement. Recent federal and state court decisions on the "choice-of-law" determination are evaluated in light of the realities of international arbitration today.

With the unprecedented growth of international trade in recent years, international commercial arbitration has evolved as the business community's solution to many of the complexities and pitfalls associated with international commercial litigation.1 For one thing, compared with in-court litigation, arbitration is often cheaper and more efficient.2 Arbitration also shields parties to international agreements from the local biases of foreign tribunals and the obvious risks of litigation in a country whose customs and laws are dissimilar from their own.3 Furthermore, as a wholly consensual process based on clearly defined contractual obligations, arbitration offers a measure of predictability and certainty to commercial transactions and to the resolution of international business disputes.4

Arbitration is further distinguished from htigation by the unique ability of the parties to agree upon many of the specific rules of arbitration that will apply in the event of a future dispute.' Prior to entering into a binding agreement, the parties are likely to negotiate such terms as the place of arbitration, the powers of the arbitrators, the confidential nature of the proceedings, and the language of the proceedings if the parties are of different dialects. Of particular importance to each party will be the inclusion of an express choice of law clause that designates the law governing the parties' contractual agreement as a whole.6 If the parties select a governing law at the onset of their transaction, an arbitrator or court is obligated to respect and to act in accordance with that law in the event of any future dispute.7

While there is little doubt that international arbitration is derived from a carefully constructed agreement between the parties, a problem may arise when the parties interpret this arbitration agreement differently. When that happens, the only available remedy is to seek judicial assistance. Accordingly, the United States has enacted federal legislation that allows U.S. courts to resolve certain pre-arbitration disputes between international parties and to compel arbitration when it is required under the terms of the parties' contractual agreement.8

In deciding whether or not to compel arbitration between international parties, U.S. courts are obligated to comply with the specific terms predetermined within the parties' arbitration agreement.' Thus, if the parties expressly limit the arbitrable issues within their contract, a court is required to respect the parties' autonomous decision not to arbitrate a particular matter." Moreover, if the parties have chosen a specific law to govern their contractual agreement, a court is required to comply with that decision as well.11

While the various judicial obligations under federal arbitration law are fairly well-settled, the proper enforcement by U.S. courts of parties' express choice of law clauses continues to be a difficult and unsettled area within commercial arbitration law. The issue stems from the question of whether the law expressly chosen by the parties to govern a dispute should be applied by a U.S. court to govern procedural questions, such as arbitrability, or is limited to the interpretation of the substantive rights of the parties under the contract. Historically, U.S. courts have ignored the parties' express choice of law and have applied only federal law to questions regarding the arbitrability of a dispute or the validity of an arbitration agreement. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Queston of Intent: Choice of Law and the International Arbitration Agreement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.