The International Criminal Court and the Applicability of International Jurisdiction under Islamic Law

By Nassar, Ahmad E. | Chicago Journal of International Law, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

The International Criminal Court and the Applicability of International Jurisdiction under Islamic Law


Nassar, Ahmad E., Chicago Journal of International Law


I. INTRODUCTION

Customarily, globalization refers to the increasing activity of transnational actors and the resulting push for greater international legal harmonization to facilitate expanding business relations. But globalization could also refer to the expansion of criminal law of universal applicability, such as the universal law against "crimes against humanity."1 Although this expansion, having taken place throughout the twentieth century, is not particularly recent, since September 11, 2001, the ability to enforce universal criminal laws has taken on greater significance.

Previously, countries would rarely allow outside authorities to exercise jurisdiction over their own citizens or even other nations' citizens residing within their territory. More often than not, disputes were resolved either by some manner of negotiation and settlement or armed conflict. Sometimes negotiations were based on bilateral or multilateral treaties requiring parties to try or extradite criminals, and other times were based solely on comity. Regardless of the method of determining the appropriate jurisdiction, it has become increasingly important that countries agree on a forum for the effective prosecution of terrorists. The International Criminal Court ("ICC") provides an interesting alternative to the traditional manners of determining the appropriate jurisdiction for trying international criminal offenses.

When one now mentions the word "terrorist," it conjures up stereotypical images of bearded Middle Eastern men desirous of martyrdom. While this is indeed unfortunate, it raises the issue of what more can be done to curb terrorism and other crimes against humanity arising from or occurring in predominantly Muslim countries. Many commentators may choose to target Muslim countries' varying degrees of application of Islamic law as a roadblock on the path towards world peace and prosperity. This Development will address whether international jurisdiction in general, and the ICC in particular, are compatible with Islamic law. Part II will deal with the compatibility of Islamic law with modern international law. Subpart A will examine the contemporary rules of international jurisdiction, while Subpart B will consider the issue under the lens of Islamic law. Finally, Part III will analyze the ICC and its relevance to Islamic law countries.

II. COMPATIBILITY OF ISLAMIC LAW WITH MODERN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Modern international law has changed dramatically in the past fifty years. In contrast, Islamic law, or the Shari'ah,2 is over fourteen centuries old, and has been viewed in recent times as somewhat monolithic. The question is therefore a basic issue of coexistence: can a jurisdiction wishing to apply the Shari'ah fulfill its obligations under contemporary international law? In particular, how are international jurisdiction principles to be applied?

A. CONTEMPORARY RULES OF INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION

There are three main varieties of jurisdiction discussed in the Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law ("Restatement"): prescriptive, adjudicative, and enforcement jurisdiction.3 Prescriptive jurisdiction is the authority of a state to apply its own laws to persons and activities.4 Adjudicative jurisdiction is the "authority of a state to subject particular persons or things to its judicial process."5 More generally, adjudicative jurisdiction is the requisite legal power to bind the defendant with a judgment-hence it focuses on the relationship between the adjudicating body and the defendant. Enforcement jurisdiction is simply the power to enforce laws; it is the ability to use government resources to "induce or compel compliance" with state law.6 Traditionally, all three types of jurisdiction must be present for a state to detain and try a suspect.7

Asserting international prescriptive jurisdiction under the Restatement can be achieved using any one of five alternatives: territorial, nationality, protective, passive personality, or universal jurisdiction. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The International Criminal Court and the Applicability of International Jurisdiction under Islamic Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.