Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia

By Sutherland, Daniel E. | The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, Winter 2003 | Go to article overview

Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia


Sutherland, Daniel E., The Arkansas Historical Quarterly


Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia. By William A. Link. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. Pp. xvii, 387. Preface, introduction, prologue, illustrations, epilogue, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00.)

Like the Energizer Bunny, debate over why the Confederate states left the Union just keeps going, and going, and going. William A. Link has no doubts about why Virginia seceded. It was all about slavery. Other explanations, most notably state rights, he maintains, came from postwar ploys by former rebels to purify their Lost Cause. This is a widely accepted argument. One could quibble about the definition of state rights, the viability of single-cause explanations of complex events, and so on, but slavery clearly was an important part of the mix. Link makes a good case for his position, too, in this first scholarly consideration of the Virginia secession movement in seventy years. However, he also complicates matters by raising new issues and leaving unanswered questions in his wake.

Link explains Virginia secession in the context of state elections during the 1850s. The principal issue of the decade, he submits, was slavery, and it was explosive. Virginia had changed during the preceding twenty years. Economic prosperity and growing urbanization-stimulated by the market and transportation revolutions-had given more political power to nonslaveholders and changed the nature of slavery. The result was a vigorous political dialogue over the future of the institution. What made this debate particularly vital, Link continues, was the influence that slaves had on political discourse. A growing sense of freedom-prompted by increases in urban slavery and slave hiring-and an awareness of the importance of slavery in the state's politics emboldened blacks. They became defiant, ran away from their masters, assaulted whites, and engaged in arson and theft. These actions, Link maintains, constituted political statements, which, in combination with growing white opposition to slavery, affected elections and permitted a coalition of Whigs, Know-Nothings, and Republicans to challenge Democratic rule.

Much of Link's interpretation makes sense. It certainly complements recent scholarship on antebellum politics, which shows a tendency for the two-party system to maintain a certain vitality in the Upper South (including Arkansas) even as it was breaking up in the Lower South. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.