New York of Appeals Permits Policyholders of "Vanishing Premium" Life Insurance of Plead Cause of Action for Deceptive Practices Pursuant to Statute but Rejects Common Law Fraud Claim

By Stempel, Jeffrey W. | Journal of Risk and Insurance, March 2000 | Go to article overview

New York of Appeals Permits Policyholders of "Vanishing Premium" Life Insurance of Plead Cause of Action for Deceptive Practices Pursuant to Statute but Rejects Common Law Fraud Claim


Stempel, Jeffrey W., Journal of Risk and Insurance


Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 94 N.Y.2d 330, 725 NE21 598, 704 N.YS 2d 177,1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3932 (New York Court of Appeals-December 20,1999).

A litigation issue of the current moment involves a life insurance product popular during the 1980s-"vanishing premium" life insurance. These products were a form of "universal" life insurance, a life insurance policy in which premiums were designed to exceed the amount strictly required to pay for the death benefit purchased by the policyholder. The additional premium dollars were to be invested by the insurer, with return on investment reinvested to pay future premiums. The idea was that after a few years of paying premiums, return on investment would equal the present value of required future premiums so that no further premium payments would be required to maintain the policy. Universal life is described as a "cash-value" insurance policy that combines "pure" life insurance (where the premium charged matches the mortality risk in light of the death benefit) and an investment component that seeks to accumulate the funds to pay future premiums.8

In traditional cash-value policies, any return on premium in excess of that required to immediately pay for coverage is returned to the policyholder in the form of dividends or interest. Early cash-value policies featured conservative investments by insurers. High interest rates during the 1980s made these unattractive products because of low return. In response, insurers began offering universal life policies in which the policyholder's accumulated money is tied to the current rate of interest. According to the Gaidon court:

Carriers marketed interest rate-sensitive insurance under a host of premium payment options, including the "vanishing premium" plan. Under this plan, the policyholder pays higher than normal premiums in the early years of the policy, resulting in a quicker accumulation of premium dollars for investment purposes. These policies are marketed on the premise that enough cash value will accumulate so that at a fixed date future administrative and insurance costs will be covered and the policyholder relieved of any further out-of-pocket premium obligations.

In the late 1980s, however, sharply declining interest rates "upset the economics" of these widely marketed policies. Accumulated cash values became insufficient to pay expected future insurance and administrative costs. By the early 1990s, many consumers who purchased such policies were required to continue out-of-pocket payment to keep their policies in force. And the lawsuits followed.

See 94 N.Y 2d at 342-43,1999 N.Y LEXIS 3932 at *11 *12 (citations omitted) 9

Specifically, class representative plaintiff Gaidon10 and others bought insurance from Guardian Life in the 1980s, allegedly on the strength of what proved to be false representations that they would absolutely be relieved of premiums after a few years. The plaintiffs also alleged that Guardian artificially inflated its current dividend rates "despite waning profits [on the invested premium] because it wanted to continue depicting competitive vanishing rates." However, on a separate page that accompanied insurer illustrations of various payment and investment return options, Guardian disclaimed:

Figures depending on dividends are neither estimated nor guaranteed, but are based on the current year's dividend scale.

The current year's dividend scale reflects current company claims, expense and investment experience and taxes under current laws. Actual future dividends may be higher or lower than those illustrated depending on the company's actual future experience.

See N.Y 2d at 339-40, 1999 N.Y LEXIS 3932 at *4-*5. In addition, the policies when delivered contained a statement saying that divisible surplus would be determined on an annual basis and that dividends would "reflect Guardian's mortality, expense, and investment experience. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

New York of Appeals Permits Policyholders of "Vanishing Premium" Life Insurance of Plead Cause of Action for Deceptive Practices Pursuant to Statute but Rejects Common Law Fraud Claim
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.