Genes or Chromosomes?

By Bethell, Tom | The American Spectator, July/August 2000 | Go to article overview

Genes or Chromosomes?


Bethell, Tom, The American Spectator


Searching anew for the origins of cancer.

Peter Duesberg of U.C. Berkeley has recently pointed out that virtually all solid malignant tumors have the wrong number of chromosomes; usually too many. Sometimes they may have several copies of a given chromosome, Cells with the wrong number of chromosomes are said to be "aneuploid"; those with the right number are "diploid." This is not a new discovery. When researchers such as Theodor Boveri studied cancer cells under the microscope a century ago, the first thing they noticed was the abundance of chromosomes. Amazingly, the correct number-46 in humans-was not determined until 1956, three years after Watson and Crick had described the much smaller, less visible double helix of DNA.

Boveri predicted in 1914 that aneuploidy would turn out to be the cause of cancer, and today Duesberg believes he was right. A recent article in the Economist about his cancer theories noted: "Dr. Duesberg achieved notoriety more than ten years ago for his hypothesis that the human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, does not cause AIDS. In terms of challenging conventional wisdom, that was a hard act to follow. The aneuploidy hypothesis, however, appears a worthy successor." Nonetheless, "the ubiquity of aneuploidy in cancers does need explaining."

Boveri's discovery was forgotten by the mid-1970's. The new theory was that gene mutations cause cancer. Michael Bishop and Harold Varmus won the Nobel Prize for discovering cellular (as opposed to viral) "oncogenes," but their ability to cause cancer is still in doubt. Later, Varmus became the director of the National Institutes of Health. For the last ao years or so the vast bulk of research funds at the disposal of the National Cancer Institute and other agencies has been devoted to the hunt for cancer genes.

Last summer, Robert A. Weinberg and William Hahn of MIT announced that the mutation of three genes was "sufficient to transform a normal human cell to one capable of producing a tumor." The New York Times duly came through with a page-one article-one of many the newspaper has published in the past 15 years about new cancer genes. But it was not reassuring to learn, in the commentary in Nature, that the most recent find had come "after more than 15 years of trying." What about all those earlier cancer genes?

When Duesberg's lab at Berkeley asked to see the cell lines generated by Weinberg's "three genes," they turned out to be aneuploid. This finding was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (March 28), with sample cells from each (of two) cell lines depicted. One had 78 chromosomes, another 82-almost double the right number. The significance of aneuploidy is that each chromosome carries anything from several hundred to thousands of genes, so that if a cell has two or three, or worse, 30 or 40 extra chromosomes, the number of genes at work in the cell has been greatly increased. Their added output is probably sufficient to override the control mechanisms that ensure the normal cell doesn't take on a life of its own, as cancer cells do. If a cell has extra chromosomes, then, and out of its thousands of extra genes a handful are mutated, how can we be sure that it is the few mutations, and not the huge DNA increment, that causes the cancer? Diploid cancer cells are what is needed to prove Duesberg wrong. (We are not talking about leukemia, where diploid cells are common.)

I phoned Weinberg's lab, and he picked up himself-a very confident voice. I asked him, first, if it is true that most solid cancers are aneuploid. His books on cancer research have not mentioned aneuploidy.

"Yes it is," he said. "But there are exceptions, and it is not true that aneuploidy is an inevitable prerequisite for making a tumor, as Duesberg would imply."

The cell lines sent to Duesberg's lab were apparently aneuploid, I said.

"That's what he says," Weinberg replied, "but we analyzed the same ones more carefully, and one of the cell lines we sent him is perfectly diploid. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Genes or Chromosomes?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.