Retrospect and Prospect: Some Thoughts on Writing South Carolina History in the South Carolina Historical Magazine

By Weir, Robert M. | South Carolina Historical Magazine, April 2000 | Go to article overview

Retrospect and Prospect: Some Thoughts on Writing South Carolina History in the South Carolina Historical Magazine


Weir, Robert M., South Carolina Historical Magazine


WERE IT NOT THAT INNOVATION BEGETS INNOVATION, WE might be justified in calling ours the age of innovation, but tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow will probably have successively greater claims to the title. Still, we clearly-and doubtless correctly-see ourselves rushing into a future where change is the chief constant. Paying enormous prices for stock in high-tech companies that have yet to make a profit may therefore not be entirely irrational, and naming an award offered by the American Historical Association to encourage scholarly publishing on the Internet the Gutenberg-e Prize seems appropriate, for the results of the present revolution in communications may well equal those that followed the introduction of printing.

Does this pell-mell pursuit of the future leave history in the dust? Some individuals might answer yes, but persuasive evidence suggests quite the contrary. Take, for example, the current controversy over the Confederate Battle Flag and whether it should continue to fly atop the South Carolina State House. That whole debate hinges on the relevance of history and its meaning to different groups. History as a discipline is also showing extraordinary vitality, not only in the quantity but also in the scope and quality of much that is being written. That this should be true when technology and change command so much attention strikes one as something of a paradox. But historians are, after all, students of change, and their workshop is, to paraphrase an apt description, "the only laboratory we have in which to test the consequences of thought..."1 Moreover, modern technology itself has given historians new tools with which to do their work. The computer, in particular, allows us to control, manipulate, and analyze mountains of data that would have defied us in the past. Investigating previously inaccessible subjects has therefore become possible, and the field has become notably more inclusive in the last thirty years or so. These developments bode well for the future of history as a discipline and for our society-meaning both the South Carolina Historical Society and the larger community of which it is a part-as it turns to the past for a sense of its own identity.

Considerations such as these suggested that it might be useful to shift the focus of my assignment a bit, while the difficulty of choosing the three most significant articles that have appeared in the Magazine during the first one hundred years of publication produced considerable motivation to reinterpret the task. Enough well researched, gracefully written, and substantial contributions crowd these pages that picking a small handful of the most significant becomes what could be euphemistically called a real challenge. My own favorites include a primary document, "Colonel Robert Gray's Observations on the War in Carolina'" which remains good history by a thoughtful loyalist who participated in the Revolution on the losing side, and C. Robert Haywood, "Mercantilism and South Carolina Agriculture, 1700-1763," which historians have cited frequently enough to make it part of the standard literature about South Carolina?2 And there are many more items deserving of at least honorable mention.

To resolve the resulting dilemma, I narrowed the definition of "significant" and imposed some arbitrary limits on the field under consideration. Colonial and Revolutionary subjects took precedence because much of the writing in the Magazine has dealt with them, and I feel most comfortable in assessing scholarship in the area of my specialization. All else being equal, I also decided to opt for older items as a way of calling attention to work published before 1954 when modern computerized data bases, such as American History and Life, began making literature searches much easier. Finally, I decided to construe "significant" as meaning not only important per se but also in some way innovative.

These criteria yielded four choices. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Retrospect and Prospect: Some Thoughts on Writing South Carolina History in the South Carolina Historical Magazine
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.