The New Crisis in Education: Who Is Cheating Whom?

By Shapiro, Svi | Tikkun, September/October 2000 | Go to article overview

The New Crisis in Education: Who Is Cheating Whom?


Shapiro, Svi, Tikkun


The New Crisis In Education: Who Is Cheating Whom?

Svi Shapiro

Svi Shapiro is director of the Ph.D. program in education and cultural studies at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and has recently edited Strangers in the Land: Pedagogy, Modernity, and Jewish Identity (Peter Lang, 2000).

Recent evidence on the extent of cheating among students in public schools provides chilling testimony to the current moral climate of education in the United States. A recent survey by the Josephson Institute of Ethics of nearly 21,000 middle and high-school students found that 70 percent of high school students admitted to cheating at least once on an exam in the previous twelve months; 45 percent of these students agreed with the statement, "A person has to lie or cheat in order to succeed." Over a third of the students questioned would be willing to cheat if it would help them get into college. In another survey of high school students (the twenty-ninth "Who's Who Among American High School Students"), 80 percent of students admitted to cheating in order to get to the top of their class. More than half said that they didn't view cheating as a big deal.

Such information hardly comes as a surprise to those of us who have been studying and struggling with the effects of the testing mania that has been sweeping the country during the past ten years. Indeed it seems to be the inevitable consequence of the "high stakes" testing in which more and more of a student's life--whether he or she completes courses, is promoted, graduates, gets into college--comes to depend on the results of a standardized test.

In the context of this increasingly dog-eat-dog world of public education, the incidence of professional employees cheating has also increased. In the past two years schools in New York, Texas, Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Kentucky, and Maryland have investigated reports of improper or illegal attempts by teachers, principals and other administrators to raise test scores. In Texas a deputy superintendent was indicted on sixteen counts of criminal tampering after central administrators and principals boosted scores by changing the identification numbers of students whose failing grades they did not want counted. In New York City cheating was so pervasive that it led to the resignation of a school superintendent.

Why are adults cheating? High stakes testing means that poor test scores put teachers' and administrators' jobs on the line. Employment, salary increases, and promotions are more and more dependent on demonstrating rising scores. The one-size-fits-all approach to testing ignores the way that income and economic circumstance interact with achievement; it means that those who work in low-income schools are at an enormous disadvantage in producing the kinds of test results that can secure their jobs.

While the advocates of testing see it as the means to improve the quality of education in this country, this cheating epidemic reveals something quite different. Far from increasing the depth and extent of what students know or understand, the emphasis on tests produces a far more instrumental and manipulative view of education among both students and educators. For students, educational chatter about knowledge and understanding is just "sweet talk," little related to the daily grind of schooling and the preoccupation with winning, losing, and getting ahead. Education becomes increasingly a high stakes game in which success is defined almost entirely by one's ability to test well through whatever means necessary. For educators, the extraordinary extent and pervasiveness of standardized tests in American schools puts a choke hold on all other educational goals and purposes. In this environment education becomes the intellectually thin process of memorization and regurgitation of predigested information. Classroom instruction is more and more given over to "test prep." In this context schools offer little that can be taken as a source of personal meaning, as a stimulus to critical thought, or as the catalyst for imaginative interpretation of human experience. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The New Crisis in Education: Who Is Cheating Whom?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.