Dissonances

By Hatzimanolis, Efi | Hecate, January 1, 1992 | Go to article overview

Dissonances


Hatzimanolis, Efi, Hecate


SNEJA GUNEW AND KATERYNA O. LONGLEY, EDS., STRIKING CHORDS: MULTICULTURAL LITERARY INTERPRETATIONS (SYDNEY: ALLEN AND UNWIN, 1992).

Recent criticism of the terms Migrant writing and multicultural writing, exemplified by articles published last year in the Australian Book Review and Island, has focused on the promotion of writings by Migrant and non-Anglo-Celtic Australians. Either implicitly or explicitly, the articles have defined the intellectual and theoretical challenges to conservative, exclusive notions of Australian Literature, especially those made by Sneja Gunew, as a continuation of colonialism in this country.

The ABR article, for example, valorises a confusing idea of quality in Australian writing defining it as `native Australian English' in opposition to the supposed poor (foreign?) quality of most Migrant writings.(1) An obvious function of this argument is to align ideas of bad writing with ideas of authentic Migrant writing. Not so obvious, perhaps, is its anxieties about the very notions of authenticity and authority which inform its idea of quality; anxieties which in my reading of the argument implicitly express a desire for the Aboriginal (native) other as a metaphor of and for an authentic `Australian' identity, for which should be read middle-class Anglo-Australian history and culture.

The Island article, albeit in more theoretically informed terms than the latter, is critical of Gunew's use of the term Migrant writing in an early Said-inspired essay.(2) In arguing that Gunew's use of the term Migrant writing functions as a sort of unconscious colonialism, the article conveniently trivialises the historical importance of her desire to use the term in deconstructive rather than descriptive ways in order to displace notions of Australian Literature; that is, to question the latter's territorialising descriptions. Of most interest to me are the ways the above oppositions to Gunew's arguments are also informed by the implied threat represented by the idea of the Migrant theoretician. Elsewhere, I have examined in greater detail the ways the discourses informing such representations operate.(3) Suffice it to say here that the idea of the Migrant critic/theoretician evokes for the writers of the abovementioned articles anxieties about power reversal intimately linked to anxieties about the in/authenticity of the Migrant critic who herself refuses to comply with the stereotype of the Migrant victim even while addressing the unequal relations of power which victimise Migrants.

Similarly, the ABR article explicitly positions readers to perceive her as some sort of race traitor, that is, as the articulate victimiser of `her own people'. Why? Because she is not a victim like other Migrants perhaps? The implications of this argument are particularly insidious because they reposition all Migrants as victims in a relation of dependency to dominant groups, while obscuring the social relations of power which inform Migrant writers' unequal access to the conditions of writing. To a lesser, but still significant extent, the Island article skirts similar anxieties in constructing a hierarchy of oppression whereby Aborigines are implicitly positioned as the only authentic victims of racism in this country. My concern is that such hierarchies of victims may foster divide and conquer tactics, particularly since the status of victim according to these terms is engendered as an enviable position worth competing for. Moreover, such ranking leaves unexamined and intact the unequal relations of power which both produce victims and also pit victims against each other.

This is not to argue against the fact that some groups have suffered and continue to suffer from social injustice, rather, it is to argue against some of the obfuscations made possible through ranking oppression in this country. Should we argue, for example, that for as long as Aborigines are not heard to speak for themselves, then `ethnics' should not theorise at all? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dissonances
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.