Election Watch: November 2000 Presidential Election May Enable Muslim - and Arab-Americans to Flex Political Muscles

By H, Richard | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May 31, 2000 | Go to article overview

Election Watch: November 2000 Presidential Election May Enable Muslim - and Arab-Americans to Flex Political Muscles


H, Richard, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


ELECTION WATCH: November 2000 Presidential Election May Enable Muslim- and Arab-Americans to Flex Political Muscles

The secular American ideal is for neither ethnicity nor religious preference to influence a citizen's political preferences. Perfection would be for the Arab-American community to split right down the middle, with 50 percent supporting Democratic candidates and 50 percent supporting Republicans, and for Muslim Americans to divide likewise, with 50 percent supporting Republicans and 50 percent Democrats.

The problem is that it's an imperfect world and the Israel lobby has based its strength on a voting bloc of American Jews. Their influence in Congress seems to erect ever higher barriers to acceptance in the U.S. of Arab Americans and Muslim Americans and their political opinions.

Another reality is that, according to its own political leaders as quoted in Jewish weeklies, the Jewish community generally gives 75 to 90 percent of its votes to Democrats. There have been exceptions. Republican Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, a relative hawk on U.S. defense policy, is said to have received 40 percent of the Jewish vote against Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson, a conciliatory Democrat if not an outright dove.

And Democrat Jimmy Carter, who was pushing Israel hard to sign a land-for-peace agreement with the Palestinians similar to the one he had brokered between Israel and Egypt, received little over half of the Jewish vote when he ran against Ronald Reagan. Those highs and lows illustrate clearly how deeply American Jewish voters are influenced by a candidate's support for Israel.

Things are much more complicated with Muslim- and Arab-Americans, who have been less extensively polled. Democratic candidates seem to have a slight edge with Arab Americans, and a stronger one among Muslim Americans of African descent, while a majority of other socially conservative Muslim Americans tilt toward Republican candidates. But where candidates stand on the Middle East, a subject of lively discussion at Arab-American and Muslim-American conventions, seems to have little measurable effect on how members of those two allied communities vote.

The result is that Jewish voters, though tiny in number since Jews are less than 2 percent of the population, have enormous political influence, both because they provide well over half of all the donations to Democratic political candidates, and because, as indicated above, they tend to vote as a bloc and therefore can swing a race to either candidate in closely contested elections. This bloc vote is helped by a consensus on, in the words of director Nathan J. Diamant of the political and legal affairs office of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, "support for Israel, arguably an issue that turns many American Jews into single-issue voters."

Again by contrast, Muslim- and Arab-Americans, who together may total as many as 10 million people, or 3.6 percent of the population, may have been less conscientious about voting, and even those who do vote tend to cancel each other out. Thus, to date, they have failed to exploit the fact that they have the potential to outnumber Jewish voters by nearly two to one. As a result they have wielded minuscule influence on U.S. domestic and foreign policies.

Happily, there are notable exceptions. In 1996 Muslim Americans voted as a bloc in New Jersey, and Pakistani Americans donated as a bloc in North Dakota. Two incumbent U.S. senators owe their victories in close election races to these actions. Undoubtedly there will be other such triumphs in this year's November elections at the local level, wherever there is a clear enough difference between candidates to unite the Muslim- and/or Arab-American voters.

A CLEAR CHOICE OF PRESIDENTS

In election year 2000 there is a clear foreign-policy difference between the presidential candidates of the two leading parties. It's not the first time. When Bill Clinton defeated George Bush in 1992, he received 85 percent of the Jewish vote, Unfortunately, there was little Arab- or Muslim-American effort to support Bush, whose work in support of a land-for-peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians had aroused the hostility of Jewish voters. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Election Watch: November 2000 Presidential Election May Enable Muslim - and Arab-Americans to Flex Political Muscles
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.