Is It Time to Rethink U.S. Policy on Iran? We Do Not Have a Reasoned, Coherent Policy with Which Our Allies Can Identify

By Ben-Meir, Alon | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, April 3, 1996 | Go to article overview

Is It Time to Rethink U.S. Policy on Iran? We Do Not Have a Reasoned, Coherent Policy with Which Our Allies Can Identify


Ben-Meir, Alon, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


Is It Time to Rethink U.S. Policy on Iran? We Do Not Have a Reasoned, Coherent Policy With Which Our Allies Can Identify

By Alon Ben-Meir

In the aftermath of four suicide bombings in Israel, Iran found itself accused by the United States of being the principal source of military and financial support for Hamas, whose military wing has claimed responsibility for three of the bombings. The U.S. stopped short of making a direct connection between Iran and the recent attacks, and Iran vehemently denied any involvement. Perhaps, instead of rushing to judgment, it is time to take a fresh look at U.S. policy toward Iran, bearing in mind ultimate U.S. strategic interests in supporting our allies and restoring stability and equilibrium in the Persian Gulf region.

The Clinton administration's Iran policy is premised on post-Cold War realities--the end of Soviet support of Arab military adventurism, the growing environment of Arab-Israeli relations, the reduction of both Iraqi and Iranian power--and rests on an attempt to keep both Iran and Iraq relatively weak vis-a-vis each other, the rest of the Middle East, and U.S. interests in the region. In short, a policy of "dual containment."

A close look at the U.S. and the Iranian positions reveals a clear misunderstanding of each other's motives, all compounded by mutual distrust fed by past U.S.-Iranian confrontations. On the one hand, the U.S. continues to regard Iran as a state that sponsors anti-U.S. and anti-Western terrorism, bent on exporting its brand of Islamic revolution and determined to undermine America's Arab allies.

On the other hand, the Iranians see themselves as reasonable and conciliatory, pointing to their useful role during the Gulf war and their efforts to secure the release of the hostages in Lebanon. The litany of charges leveled by both sides against each other could be extended almost indefinitely; the point is that we and the Iranians have reached a stage in our relations when hostility and recrimination no longer serve any useful purpose.

First of all, our embargo and sanctions have failed to cripple the regime, much less stem the growing trade Iran carries on with our own European allies and the rest of the world. And there is no little hypocrisy in our stance: we have been buying Iranian oil through third parties for the past several years now. While the Iranian economy is in difficulty, it is by no means in crisis. There is growing international interest in Iran as a potentially lucrative investment platform, and many of the companies that put their assets "on ice" during the revolution are now being encouraged to reopen their offices.

Iranians themselves, for all the repressiveness and intolerance of their regime, have begun carving out autonomous social and political space for themselves, and it is clear that the religious zeal that characterized the early years has begun to diminish throughout the country. Finally, there is the inescapable fact that Iran, for all its troubles and problems, is slowly regaining its position as the hegemon of the Gulf, and as it re-emerges, has begun to signal that given the right conditions, U.S.-Iranian relations could improve.

Although Iran and the U.S. are two profoundly different societies, there still exists in Iran a deep attraction for Western lifestyles. Since the country borrowed much of its institutional base, infrastructure, and technology from the West, Iran's clergy knows that major changes will have to take place if the country is to avert political and economic disaster. What is needed, then, is a new thinking based on the changed realities in the region, and initiatives to suit.

Hostility and recrimination no longer serve any useful purpose.

The U.S. should adopt a policy that would engage those Iranians disposed to seek American contact. There are now self-interested, pragmatic people, both in and out of the Iranian government, who can be engaged to our mutual benefit. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is It Time to Rethink U.S. Policy on Iran? We Do Not Have a Reasoned, Coherent Policy with Which Our Allies Can Identify
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.