Do Fundamentalist Victories in Jordanian Elections Threaten Liberalization?

By Amr, Wafa | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, January 31, 1990 | Go to article overview

Do Fundamentalist Victories in Jordanian Elections Threaten Liberalization?


Amr, Wafa, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


The stunning victory of Muslim Brotherhood and allied candidates in Jordan's first parliamentary elections in 22 years foreshadows the problems confronting King Hussein's liberalization drive. The Nov. 8 election, the first since April 1967, was to be the initial move in a series of steps to widen democracy, political freedom and tolerance.

After the June 1967 war with Israel, King Hussein dissolved the parliament, which consisted of deputies representing both banks of the River Jordan. The Israeli occupation of the West Bank excluded the possibility of general elections while part of the land was occupied. However, when King Hussein severed legal and administrative ties with the West Bank last year, the constitutional gap was overcome by carrying out elections that excluded West Bank deputies. Hence the parliament elected in 1989 is the first parliament since 1951 that is purely Jordanian.

A Purely Jordanian Parliament

It will be dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, which emerged with a total of 34 seats. The Brotherhood itself won 23 seats in the 80-seat assembly. Leftists and their supporters secured around 12 seats. The outcome of the election was expected, but the number of seats the Brotherhood and like-minded candidates secured exceeded all predictions.

The strength and influence of the Muslim Brotherhood has been building up over the years, since it was the only group permitted to operate in the open when political parties were banned by law after 1957. (Leftist parties still are banned.) The Brotherhood also made use of other available privileges, such as access to the mosques and its domination of public institutions such as the Ministry of Education and the universities. At the same time, the existing leftist political parties were struggling to maintain their identity through underground work.

"The Brotherhood easily met five times a day during prayers, whereas we had to take the necessary precautions when calling for a meeting for fear of arrest," a member of the Jordanian Communist Party (JCP) said. Furthermore, the Brotherhood is a highly organized, disciplined group. Its election campaign rallies were frequently attended by crowds of 10,000 or more supporters.

In the absence of political parties, for many people there was no alternative to "Islam" as a refuge from political and economic frustrations, according to some analysts.

Others have a different explanation: "The Islamic trend flourishes during perods of political relaxation and economic well-being," one observer said.

When bread riots hit the southern parts of the Kingdom early in 1989, the Muslim Brotherhood withdrew from the scene and took no part in popular outcries for political freedoms and the downfall of the government. Popular demands during and after the riots for the trial of corrupt officials, however, were supported by the majority of the 650 candidates, including Brotherhood candidates.

In the wake of the elections, there is a popular desire to start the reorganization of the country by putting "clean" figures into government positions. Many not necessarily religious Jordanians interviewed said they voted for the Brotherhood because they wanted to replace corrupt, self-interested people with honest God-fearing candidates.

Speaking of a candidate for whom she had voted, one housewife said: "I don't know what he stands for politically, but he is a good Muslim and would think twice before committing improper actions." The Brotherhood may also have won over some Jordanians of Palestinian origin by its calls for holy war or "jihad" to liberate all of Palestine, and for opening the boundaries of neighboring countries to achieve this end. These calls appeal to some Palestinian refugees from within Israel's pre-1967 borders, since the PLO's declared state on the West Bank and Gaza Strip has deepened their feelings of loss and aroused their concern over their right to return. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Do Fundamentalist Victories in Jordanian Elections Threaten Liberalization?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.