Place and Attrition from Substance Abuse Treatment

By Jacobson, Jerry O. | Journal of Drug Issues, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

Place and Attrition from Substance Abuse Treatment


Jacobson, Jerry O., Journal of Drug Issues


High rates of attrition are one of the greatest problems interfering with the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programs. Though unexamined to date, this paper argues that where a client lives, where treatment is delivered, and the relationship between these locations may influence both voluntary and involuntary dropout. The notion of a "treatment ecology" is presented, and theories of mechanisms by which location may impact attrition are developed through a review of related literature. In other fields, lack of attention to theory prior to empirical investigations of contextual effects has prompted criticism and made interpretation of empirical results difficult. Neighborhood disadvantage, drug availability, community resources, restorative qualities of the neighborhood, and travel burden are identified as promising areas for study. Current conceptual models of treatment outcomes are first reviewed to identify how they might accommodate attention to place. Policy implications and special considerations for future empirical work on this topic are discussed briefly.

INTRODUCTION

Substance abuse treatment programs in the U.S. that receive public funds logged more than 1.1 million admissions involving an illicit drug problem annually from 1992 to 1999.' However, completion rates and engagement on the part of the participant in these programs are generally low. For example, statewide estimates from the California Alcohol and Drug Data System suggest that nearly 70% of drug treatment clients admitted to residential programs stay less than 90 days (Maglione, Chao, & Anglin, 2000), and the growing body of retention studies typically reports rates of attrition from about 25% to 75%, depending on the treatment modality and definition of dropout (e.g., Joe, Simpson, & Broome, 1998; De Leon, Hawke, Jainchill, & Melnick, 2000; Hiller Knight, & Simpson, 1999; Veach, Remley, & Kippers, 2000; Lang & Belenko, 2000; Stahler, Cohen, & Shipley, 1993). Client attrition is considered by some to be "one of the greatest problems interfering with treatment effectiveness in substance abuse programs" generally (Stahler et al., 1993) and "one of the main challenges" facing clients coerced into treatment by the criminal justice system (Sia, Dansereau, & Czuchry, 2000). Indeed, previous investigations into the causes of attrition have been motivated not only by high dropout rates, but by the finding that a longer stay in treatment is among the few consistent predictors of better posttreatment outcomes (Hubbard, Craddock, Flynn, Anderson, & Ethridge, 1997; Simpson, Joe, Broome et al, 1997; see Anglin & Hser, 1990 for a review). Although prior studies have examined a broad range of factors related to client background, severity and nature of abuse, and components of the treatment program, as a rule they have come up short in explaining much of the observed variation in retention among treatment clients.

One aspect that remains unexamined by the literature on retention to date is the role of geographic and neighborhood context. This paper argues that there is good reason to believe that many of the contextual factors that define the treatment client's living and treatment environments and their interactions may play a causal role in both voluntary and involuntary dropout decisions. Despite passing mention of the importance of neighborhood context and treatment facility location in the literature on treatment outcomes more generally (e.g., Joe, Simpson, & Sells, 1994; Davis & Tunks, 1990-1991; Rohsenhow, Niaura, Childress, Abrams, & Monti, 1990-1991; Tucker, Vuchinich, & Gladsjo, 1990-1991; lguchi & Stitzer, 1991), thoughtful consideration of causal mechanisms to guide hypothesis generation and testing in the area of retention has been lacking. Attention to causal mechanisms is particularly important in neighborhood effects studies, however, where self-selection into neighborhoods makes endogeneity and confounding a real concern and where potential, systematic differences in variation across subjects within neighborhoods raise problems for traditional regression models. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Place and Attrition from Substance Abuse Treatment
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.