Ricochets and Replies

Aerospace Power Journal, Fall 2000 | Go to article overview

Ricochets and Replies


We encourage your comments via letters to the editor or comment cards. All correspondence should be addressed to the Editor, Aerospace Power Journal, 401 Chennault Circle, Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6428. You can also send your comments by E-mail to editor@cadre.maxwell af. mil. We reserve the right to edit the material for overall length. PARTING THOUGHTS ON APJ'S FUTURE My retirement in September makes this the last issue in which I will be identified as APJ@ senior editor. To mark the occasion, the editor, Lt Col Eric Ash, has granted me the space to share some final thoughts on my two-anda-half years with APJ.

I won't bore you with the usual platitudes: "It's been a challenging and rewarding experience" (it was); "I was privileged to work with some great people" (I was); and "The editor's a great boss" (I had the privilege of working for three editors, and all were outstanding officers and exceptional choices to protect and nurture the Air Force's professional dialogue). Nor will I extol the changes we have made to improve the publication's content and visibility (even though I am particularly proud of our recent accomplishments).

Instead, I wanted to leave you with a few observations concerning the nature of the journal and its future. For, in spite of the selfcongratulatory tone above, I fear that future is by no means assured to be a long or prosperous one. Does that sound alarmist? And, you may ask, how can it be so when I have just said that APf is currently in good hands with positive trends?

I believe that the success of this professional journal results from a balance-perhaps healthy tension is a better term-between three major stakeholding groups: the editorial staff, senior leadership, and readers and contributors (with the officer corps as the main focus). Tension conveys the right image, as all the interested parties try to pull APJ in their direction. As long as these groups exert more-or-less equal forces in opposing directions, a rough-- but hopefully intellectually stimulating-- form of equilibrium is maintained. However, if someone pulls too hard or gives up-and if the resulting distortion is large or lasting-- then the results can be catastrophic. This is no mere conjecture, as demonstrated by the demise of Air University Review.

What would cause the imbalance? Given competing and conflicting demands for time, it is easy to see how officers may come to believe that supporting or even monitoring the profession's dialogue is a luxury they cannot afford. More than this, both human nature and military culture foster the view that debate is often inefficient and inconvenient. Certainly for those charged with implementing plans, programs, or policies, some debate will hit too close to home. Finally, a few people, through ignorance or partisanship, even question the reason for having a professional journal-why nurture dissent in the service or make counterarguments or vulnerabilities available to the opposition?

While it is easy to see how apathy or, worse, outright hostility to APJ or its mission can arise, less obvious-but, I believe, just as important-is the notion that people or groups can "care too much" and that this too can be harmful. This is the equivalent to "pulling too hard" in my analogy because the group taking such a superproprietary interest will invariably act to the detriment of the other stakeholders. If, for example, the editor or someone else up the chain of command comes to see it as "his or her journal," others will lose interest if they feel their needs are not being served. Useful debate will shift elsewhere, and APJ will lose respect and support. (It is important to note here that a belief that certain opinions are being promoted or suppressed can be as much a matter of perception as reality. I am dismayed, but no longer surprised, at accusations that we would refuse to publish people or opinions based on anything other than the quality of their ideas and arguments. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Ricochets and Replies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.